<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rahmat Wibowo's harassment against Fadel Muhammad — evidence feed</title><link>https://rahmatwibowo.com/targets/fadel-muhammad/</link><description>New evidence of Rahmat Wibowo's online harassment targeting Fadel Muhammad.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rahmatwibowo.com/targets/fadel-muhammad/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rahmat Wibowo accuses Fadel Muhammad and Ainun Najib of practicing blind loyalty toward Ibrahim Arief, arguing their public defense of him despite documented legal and ethical allegations normalizes silencing complainants and undermines accountability in professional ecosystems.</title><link>https://rahmatwibowo.com/evidence/ev-20260607-014-rahmat-wibowo-accuses-fadel-muhammad-and-ainun-najib-of-practicing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://rahmatwibowo.com/evidence/ev-20260607-014-rahmat-wibowo-accuses-fadel-muhammad-and-ainun-najib-of-practicing/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Rahmat Wibowo accuses Fadel Muhammad and Ainun Najib of practicing blind loyalty toward Ibrahim Arief, arguing their public defense of him despite documented legal and ethical allegations normalizes silencing complainants and undermines accountability in professional ecosystems.</description></item><item><title>Rahmat Wibowo criticized Ibrahim Arief's defense in the "Kawal Ibam" corruption case, arguing that character references and claims of sacrificed opportunities (such as declining a Meta London position) are insufficient evidence and constitute logical fallacies rather than proof of innocence.</title><link>https://rahmatwibowo.com/evidence/ev-20260607-002-rahmat-wibowo-criticized-ibrahim-ariefs-defense-in-the-kawal-ibam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://rahmatwibowo.com/evidence/ev-20260607-002-rahmat-wibowo-criticized-ibrahim-ariefs-defense-in-the-kawal-ibam/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Rahmat Wibowo criticized Ibrahim Arief's defense in the "Kawal Ibam" corruption case, arguing that character references and claims of sacrificed opportunities (such as declining a Meta London position) are insufficient evidence and constitute logical fallacies rather than proof of innocence.</description></item></channel></rss>