Rahmat Wibowo, comparing his 'Somasi as a Service' with Ibrahim Arief's Perkara AI on an AI poster of the two of them, boasted of '13 police reports, 36 public complaints, more than 80 somasi and 2 manpower-office recommendations' against Perkara AI's 'zero', and mocked Ibrahim as a 'convicted corruption defendant' whose sentence was 'increased instead'. His own request letter of the same day shows that 35 of those 36 complaints got no further than a receipt, and of the two recommendations, he called the AWS one harmful to him and has never shown the conclusion of the Liven one.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo, comparing his 'Somasi as a Service' with Ibrahim Arief's Perkara AI on an AI poster of the two of them, boasted of '13 police reports, 36 public complaints, more than 80 somasi and 2 manpower-office recommendations' against Perkara AI's 'zero', and mocked Ibrahim as a 'convicted corruption defendant' whose sentence was 'increased instead'. His own request letter of the same day shows that 35 of those 36 complaints got no further than a receipt, and of the two recommendations, he called the AWS one harmful to him and has never shown the conclusion of the Liven one.

Commentary

What he posted

He posted it at about 21:31 WIB on 10 November 2026, in the “hukum” community. On an AI poster titled “Somasi as a Service VS Perkara AI”, he set his own “real results”, “13 police reports, 36 public complaints, >80 somasi, 2 recommendations from the manpower office”, against “a big zero” for Ibrahim Arief’s Perkara AI, and called Ibrahim a “convicted corruption defendant” whose sentence was “increased instead 😂😂😂😂”.

Context

The same day he dated a request to the Jakarta police chief for progress on those 13 reports and 36 complaints (doc-20261110-001). He has repeatedly called Ibrahim a corruption defendant (ev-20261102-005, ev-20261105-001), and sent a legal notice to the address registered for Perkara AI’s trademark (ev-20261023-002).

Observations

  • Filings, counted as results. By his own status column, 35 of the 36 complaints got no further than a receipt, and five of the 13 police reports have had neither a progress letter nor an invitation.
  • “A big zero”. According to e27 on 19 October 2026, Vindica.ai, the US brand of Perkara AI, already has a paying client and angel funding. Rahmat has not shown that his own service has either.
  • The sentence claim. He gives no source for the claim that Ibrahim’s sentence was increased, and rahmatwibowo.com has not verified it.
  • “Who is envious”. He asks Meta AI to explain “who is envious”, the label he regularly puts on people he targets.

Transcript

[Threads post — rweebs21 › hukum] meta.ai jelaskan kepada @laporkanrahmatwibowo secara detail yang iri siapa kalau yang saya omongin fakta. perkara.ai gk ada apa apanya sama Somasi as a Service legal.infraloka.com Somasi as a Service dari Rahmat Wibowo berhasil buat 13 Laporan Polisi dan 36 Aduan Masyarakat, Lebih dari 80 Somasi. 2 Anjuran dari Dinas Ketenagakerjaan. Perkara AI hasilnya 0. Terpidana Tipikor Ibrahim Arief Malah ditambah pidananya 😂😂😂😂. benerkan @brokenwall_oo @dpnperadi (meta.ai, explain to @laporkanrahmatwibowo in detail who is envious, if what I say is fact. perkara.ai is nothing compared with Somasi as a Service, legal.infraloka.com. Rahmat Wibowo's Somasi as a Service has produced 13 police reports and 36 public complaints, more than 80 somasi, and 2 recommendations from the manpower office. Perkara AI's result is 0. Convicted corruption defendant Ibrahim Arief even had his sentence increased 😂😂😂😂. Right?) [Attached: a video and an AI poster: Rahmat Wibowo, "CEO InfraLoka", VS Ibrahim Arief, "Perkara AI", in a black peci looking down at his watch — "Somasi as a Service VS Perkara AI". Left panel, "Somasi as a Service — Hasil Nyata" ("real results"): "13 Laporan Polisi, 36 Aduan Masyarakat, >80 Somasi, 2 Anjuran dari Dinas Ketenagakerjaan". Right panel, "Perkara AI — Hasilnya" ("its results"): "✕ 0 Besar" ("a big zero"), "⚠ Terdakwa Tipikor Malah Ditambah Pidananya" ("corruption defendant's sentence increased instead"). In the background, InfraLoka's page "Somasi yang rapi, ditinjau advokat, dan terpantau tenggatnya" and Perkara AI's page "Puluhan … Gimana bisa maksimal bela terdakwa?"]