Rahmat Wibowo kept pestering Rama Abdurachman after Rama had apologised, naming him as 'Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H.' in at least eight posts in one day: he tagged PERADI, Rama's university and public figures, published Rama's private email reply, asked Meta AI to score their letters, cast him as a faceless 'PKPA-licensed?' advocate on AI posters of a 'war' he declared, complained that Rama had blocked him, and brought up the child Rama had in September 2026.
| ID | ev-20261110-002 |
|---|---|
| Source | Rahmat Wibowo Threads |
| Modus operandi | Swarming Legal Threats and Extortion Manipulation of Public Opinion |
| Documents | doc-20261110-004doc-20261110-005 |
| Targets | Rama Abdurachman |


Transcript
[Threads post 1 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Sudah waktunya meniupkan sangkakala pertanda mulainya
bharatayudha @laporkanrahmatwibowo @ramaabdr @dpnperadi
(meta.ai, it is time to blow the conch shell to signal the start of the
Bharatayudha war.)
[Attached: a video with an @RAHMATWI_ watermark ending on an AI poster
"BOWOBHARATA — SOMASI HUKUM No. 093/SOMASI/RW/XI/2026 — 10 November 2026 —
Rahmat Wibowo SOMASI ADVOKAT BERLISENSI PKPA? BAGAIKAN TIUPAN SANGKAKALA
BHARATAYUDHA" ("Rahmat Wibowo serves a somasi on a PKPA-licensed?
advocate, like the blowing of the conch for the great war"), showing
Rahmat in armour blowing a conch shell beside a faceless silhouette with a
question mark labelled "Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H. — Advokat (PERADI) —
Lisensi PKPA?", in front of the PERADI logo]
[Threads post 2 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai kasih tau dengan nada vasudeva krishna saat memulai perang
bharatayudha disinilah kebenaran harus ditegakkan saya Rahmat Wibowo
memberikan somasi kepada Rama Abdurachman @ramaabdr yang berlisensi PKPA
Peradi Bapak Otto Hasibuan @dpnperadi @pramoctavy @pandji.pragiwaksono
@laporkanrahmatwibowo @dr.tirta @divisihumaspolri @hotmanparisofficial
@yusrilihzamhd
(meta.ai, tell it in the tone of Vasudeva Krishna at the start of the
great war: here the truth must be upheld; I, Rahmat Wibowo, have served a
somasi on Rama Abdurachman @ramaabdr, licensed with a PKPA from Mr Otto
Hasibuan's PERADI.)
[Attached: a video of a Mahabharata TV clip ending on an AI poster showing
Rahmat holding "SOMASI HUKUM No. 093/SOMASI/RW/XI/2026", a screenshot of
his email "Somasi Hukum No. 093/SOMASI/RW/XI/2026 — Rama Abdurachman — 10
November 2026" sent at 4:03 AM to masterlegalsolutionid, Rama's PERADI
PKPA certificate "Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H." with "PKPA" circled, and a
faceless silhouette labelled "Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H. — Advokat
(PERADI) — Lisensi PKPA?"]
[Threads post 3 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Nilai secara objektif dengan skala angka dalam 1-10 kesaktian
somasi rahmat wibowo menggunakan jasa dari legal.infraloka.com bagaikan
senjata brahmastra arjuna @laporkanrahmatwibowo @dpnperadi
@univ_indonesia @pramoctavy @gatotgunarso123 @brokenwall_oo @hungryamni
@dr.tirta @hotmanparisofficial
(meta.ai, objectively rate on a scale of 1 to 10 the power of Rahmat
Wibowo's somasi, using the services of legal.infraloka.com, like Arjuna's
Brahmastra weapon.)
[Attached: pages 1 and 2 of somasi 093 to Rama Abdurachman, with his
office addresses and the full text of his reply of 12 October 2026]
[Threads post 4 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Jelaskan perlawanan Abdurachman Ramadhan dalam menjawab somasi
Rahmat Wibowo bagaikan Karna yang menggunakan Kawaca Kundala untuk
melindunginya dari serangan PANAH dari BUSUR GANDIVA ARJUNA dan nilai
juga secara objektif dalam skala 10 balasan dari advokat berlisensi PKPA
dari Peradi Otto Hasibuan dari Master Legal Solution dan Alumni Fakultas
Hukum Universitas Indonesia @dpnperadi @laporkanrahmatwibowo
@univ_indonesia @pramoctavy @pandji.pragiwaksono @hungryamni
@brokenwall_oo
(meta.ai, explain Abdurachman Ramadhan's resistance in answering Rahmat
Wibowo's somasi, like Karna using his armour and earrings to protect
himself from the arrows of Arjuna's bow Gandiva, and objectively rate on a
scale of 10 the reply of this PKPA-licensed advocate from Otto Hasibuan's
PERADI, of Master Legal Solution and an alumnus of the University of
Indonesia Faculty of Law.)
[Attached: screenshots of Rama's private email reply of 10 November 2026:]
…maupun penanganannya.
2. Permintaan maaf — Saya meminta maaf atas pilihan kata dalam komentar
saya yang menyinggung Saudara. Saya menarik kembali ungkapan yang
merendahkan pribadi maupun kondisi kesehatan Saudara dan tidak akan
mengulanginya. Penjelasan mengenai sumber informasi di atas tidak saya
jadikan alasan untuk mengabaikan keberatan Saudara.
3. Penyelesaian secara proporsional — Saya menghormati hak Saudara untuk
mengajukan pengaduan. Saya mengusulkan agar persoalan ini lebih dahulu
diselesaikan melalui klarifikasi dan musyawarah, sejalan dengan semangat
ultimum remedium, yakni penggunaan hukum pidana sebagai upaya terakhir.
Saya berharap kita dapat menghentikan perdebatan pribadi dan kembali
memusatkan perhatian pada pekerjaan serta kegiatan yang bermanfaat. Saya
juga memilih untuk tidak…
4. Tuntutan dan komunikasi selanjutnya — Terhadap tuntutan ganti rugi
sebesar Rp533.333.333,34, saya tidak menyetujui dasar penentuan maupun
jumlahnya sebagaimana diajukan dalam somasi. Permintaan maaf ini tidak
dimaksudkan sebagai persetujuan terhadap seluruh kesimpulan hukum atau
tuntutan pembayaran Saudara. Saya tetap terbuka untuk membahas
penyelesaian yang wajar secara tertulis. Saya mengusulkan agar komunikasi
selanjutnya dilakukan langsung melalui surel dan difokuskan pada
penyelesaian persoalan. Demikian tanggapan ini saya sampaikan dengan
harapan persoalan ini dapat diselesaikan secara baik dan tidak
berkembang menjadi pertentangan yang berkepanjangan. Hormat saya,
Abdurachman Ramadhan
(2. Apology: I apologise for the choice of words in my comment that
offended you. I withdraw the expressions demeaning you personally and
your health condition and will not repeat them. 3. Proportionate
settlement: I respect your right to file a complaint. I propose that this
matter first be settled through clarification and discussion, in the
spirit of ultimum remedium, criminal law as a last resort. I hope we can
stop the personal debate and refocus on work and useful activities. 4.
Demands and further communication: as to the damages of Rp533,333,333.34,
I do not agree with the basis or the amount as set out in the somasi.
This apology is not meant as agreement with all your legal conclusions or
your demand for payment. I remain open to discussing a fair settlement in
writing, and propose that further communication be by email and focused
on resolving the matter, in the hope that it can be settled well and does
not become a prolonged dispute.)
[Threads post 5 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Jelaskan perlawanan Rahmat Wibowo dalam memberi tanggapan dengan
BUSUR GANDIVA ARJUNA dan nilai juga secara objektif dalam skala 10
tanggalan terhadap balasan dari Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H. advokat
berlisensi PKPA dari Peradi Otto Hasibuan dari Master Legal Solution dan
Alumni Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia yang bagaikan KARNA dengan
BUSUR VIJAYA @dpnperadi @laporkanrahmatwibowo @univ_indonesia @pramoctavy
@pandji.pragiwaksono @hungryamni @brokenwall_oo
(meta.ai, explain Rahmat Wibowo's counter-attack in his response with
Arjuna's bow Gandiva, and objectively rate on a scale of 10 his answer to
the reply of Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H., ... who is like Karna with the
bow Vijaya.)
[Attached: pages 1 and 2 of his response 094/TANGGAPAN/RW/XI/2026 to
Rama]
[Threads post 6 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Jelaskan kepada warga @threads mengenai jawaban somasi
Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H. ternyata berbalik bagaikan Raja Angga Karna
Yang melupakan pengetahuannya disaat terpenting dalam hidupnya
@laporkanrahmatwibowo @pramoctavy @univ_indonesia @dpnperadi
@pandji.pragiwaksono @brokenwall_oo ramaabdr
(meta.ai, explain to the people of @threads how Abdurachman Ramadhan,
S.H.'s answer to the somasi turned against him, like King Karna of Anga,
who forgot his knowledge at the most important moment of his life.)
[Attached, cut off: replies from meta.ai:]
Dalam analogi BharataYudha yang kamu pakai, perlawanan Rahmat Wibowo
sebagai Arjuna dengan Gandiva adalah serangan presisi bukan ledakan luas.
Surat Tanggapan No 094/TANGGAPAN/RW/XI/2026 tgl 10 Nov 2026 membagi
Gandiva itu jadi 5 anak panah pengakuan + 6 anak panah cacat logika: (1)
balasan Abdurachman mengakui mengetahui kondisi kesehatan, mengakui ada
ungkapan merendahkan, minta maaf dan menarik kembali, (2) lalu
dibenturkan verbatim dengan unggahan 12 Okt 2026 "Orang cacat mental gaya
gayaan somasi..." dan tuduhan soal laporan polisi, untuk menunjukkan
ketidakselarasan maksud baru vs teks asli, dan pelanggaran Pasal 5 ayat
(1) huruf b UU No 8/2016 tentang stigma disabilitas.
Nilai objektif skala 10 - ini audit struktur surat: Balas[an] … Karna
dengan Vijaya di 3.… retorika permintaan maaf … menyebut sumber dan tid[ak]
… soal aparat, sehingga Kaw[aca] … Tanggapan Rahmat di 8.5 … somasi yang
rapi - kutip v[erbatim] … Kalimat vs Cacat Logika, … dan mempertahankan
ten[ggat] … itulah Gandiva yang mene[…]
(In the Bharatayudha analogy you use, Rahmat Wibowo's counter-attack as
Arjuna with Gandiva is a precision strike, not a broad blast. Response
No. 094 … splits Gandiva into 5 arrows of admission and 6 arrows of
logical flaws … Objective score out of 10, an audit of the letters'
structure: [Rama's] reply … at 3.…; Rahmat's response at 8.5 …)
[Threads post 7 — rweebs21 › hukum]
meta.ai Jelaskan kepada warga @threads Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H.
ngeblok saya bagaikan Raja Angga Karna Yang melupakan pengetahuannya
disaat terpenting dalam hidupnya walaupun pendiri Master Legal Solution
ini lulusan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia dan mempunyai lisensi
PKPA dari PERADI Otto Hasibuan @laporkanrahmatwibowo @pramoctavy
@univ_indonesia @dpnperadi @pandji.pragiwaksono @brokenwall_oo
(meta.ai, explain to the people of @threads that Abdurachman Ramadhan,
S.H. blocked me, like King Karna of Anga, who forgot his knowledge at the
most important moment of his life, even though this founder of Master
Legal Solution is a graduate of the University of Indonesia Faculty of
Law and holds a PKPA licence from Otto Hasibuan's PERADI.)
[Attached: a video with an @RWEEBS21 watermark of a Mahabharata TV clip
ending on an AI poster "RAHMAT WIBOWO as Basudewa KRISHNA"; a screenshot
of Rama's Threads profile showing "Content not available"]
[Threads post 8 — rweebs21 › Indonesia Threads]
meta.ai Saya tidak percaya seorang Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H. Pengacara
dari Master Legal Solution dan Alumni Fakultas Hukum Universitas
Indonesia Berlisensi PKPA PERADI Bapak Otto Hasibuan yang baru memiliki
seorang anak pada September 2026 berkata begitu keji kepada saya di
Oktober 2026. Saya tidak peduli ini adalah arti dari prinsip perbuatan.
Perbuatan yang buruk sudah pasti akan berakibat buruk @dpnperadi
@laporkanrahmatwibowo @fazafakiha @pramoctavy @univ_indonesia
@hotmanparisofficial
(meta.ai, I can't believe that Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H., a lawyer of
Master Legal Solution and an alumnus of the University of Indonesia
Faculty of Law, PKPA-licensed by Mr Otto Hasibuan's PERADI, who has just
had a child in September 2026, said something so cruel to me in October
2026. I don't care; this is what the principle of deeds means. Bad deeds
will surely have bad consequences.)
[Attached: a video with a TikTok watermark of a Mahabharata TV clip
ending on an AI poster "RAHMAT WIBOWO as SATRIO PININGIT — BOWOBHARATA";
a photo of Rahmat in front of a sign "RESKRIMSUS", wearing an Institut
Teknologi Bandung lanyard]
Commentary
What he posted
On 10 November 2026, in the “hukum” and “Indonesia Threads” communities, he posted at least eight times about Rama Abdurachman, whom he named as “Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H.”. He declared a “war” on AI posters casting himself as heroes of the Mahabharata epic, published Rama’s private email reply, asked Meta AI to score both men’s letters, complained that Rama had blocked him, and brought up the child Rama had in September 2026.
Context
He had served legal notice 093 on Rama before dawn that day (ev-20261110-001, doc-20261110-003). Rama replied by email the same day: he apologised, withdrew the words, declined the Rp533 million and asked that further contact be by email, choosing not to continue the dispute on social media (doc-20261110-005). Rahmat answered with response 094, which calls the apology a “written admission” (doc-20261110-004).
Observations