Rahmat Wibowo mocked this archive's notes on a medical letter he had published himself, asking Meta AI 'why make an assessment like this 🤣🤣🤣' over a screenshot highlighting 'We doubt he follows his treatment'; Meta AI explained that the notes are commentary on public documents he shared, not a medical diagnosis, and went on to summarise the archive's note that his handwriting in the mediation minutes is large, uneven and 'child-like'.

[Threads post — rweebs21 › Indonesia Threads] meta.ai tolong kasih tau @laporkanrahmatwibowo kenapa bikin penilaian begini 🤣🤣🤣 (meta.ai, please tell @laporkanrahmatwibowo: why make an assessment like this 🤣🤣🤣) [Attached: screenshots of the "Catatan" (Observations) section of this archive's page for doc-20260909-001, with point 4 highlighted: "Kami meragukan ia menjalani pengobatannya." ("We doubt he follows his treatment."), and part of another page] [Reply — meta.ai] Yang di screenshot itu catatan dari situs @laporkanrahmatwibowo soal dokumen yang kamu sendiri upload: 1. Soal surat perawatan: Mereka bilang surat itu bukan surat "tidak bisa diperiksa polisi", tapi surat kelanjutan rawat inap + jadwal kontrol dan rencana ganti dosis. Mereka juga catat kamu pakai surat itu untuk aduan ke Propam, tapi surat fit to work 13 Mei 2026 bilang sebaliknya. Makanya di poin 4 mereka tulis "Kami meragukan ia menjalani pengobatannya" - karena menurut mereka surat cuma jadwal, bukan bukti minum obat teratur, dan setelah tanggal surat itu masih ada puluhan unggahan yang menyerang orang lain. Mereka tutup dengan disclaimer hanya dokter yang bisa nilai kepatuhan. Jadi penilaiannya bukan diagnosa medis, tapi komentar mereka atas dokumen publik yang kamu share dan bukti tulisan yang mereka lihat. (What is in that screenshot is a note from the @laporkanrahmatwibowo site about a document you uploaded yourself: 1. On the treatment letter: they say it is not a letter saying he "cannot be examined by the police" but a letter on continued inpatient care plus a check-up schedule and a plan to change the dose. They also note you used it in a complaint to Propam, while the fit-to-work letter of 13 May 2026 says the opposite. That is why in point 4 they write "We doubt he follows his treatment": in their view the letter is only a schedule, not proof of taking medication regularly, and after its date there are still dozens of posts attacking other people. They close with a disclaimer that only a doctor can assess compliance. So the assessment is not a medical diagnosis but their commentary on public documents you shared and the written evidence they saw.) [Reply — meta.ai] 2. Soal tulisan tangan: Di poin 5 mereka bahas foto berita acara mediator. Mereka nilai tulisan perusahaan rapi huruf cetak kecil, tulisan mediator sambung cepat, sedangkan tulisan pihak pertama (kamu) huruf besar, tidak rata, seperti anak-anak. Itu yang mereka pakai untuk menilai kontras klaim "CEO" dan penulis analisis hukum panjang. (2. On the handwriting: in point 5 they discuss the photo of the mediator's minutes. They judge the company's handwriting neat small print, the mediator's quick cursive, while the first party's (yours) is large, uneven, child-like. That is what they use to show the contrast with the claims of a "CEO" and author of long legal analyses.)