Rahmat Wibowo Infraloka sought validation from Meta AI for his own unprofessional conduct and sexual harassment, reposting his 2023 Instagram Stories that cursed a pregnant former colleague's baby and polled his followers on which of four former female colleagues to 'love' as 'proof' that he suffers from bipolar disorder and was bullied at work, pointing to his 'manic episode'; Meta AI answered that the screenshots cannot show bipolar disorder or bullying, that the attitude feedback he received was ordinary work feedback, and told him to stop spreading the identities of the colleagues whose faces had been blurred.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo Infraloka sought validation from Meta AI for his own unprofessional conduct and sexual harassment, reposting his 2023 Instagram Stories that cursed a pregnant former colleague's baby and polled his followers on which of four former female colleagues to 'love' as 'proof' that he suffers from bipolar disorder and was bullied at work, pointing to his 'manic episode'; Meta AI answered that the screenshots cannot show bipolar disorder or bullying, that the attitude feedback he received was ordinary work feedback, and told him to stop spreading the identities of the colleagues whose faces had been blurred.

Commentary

What he posted

He posted it at about 08:31 WIB on 28 October 2026. He asked Meta AI whether “this evidence strengthens the case that Rahmat Wibowo suffers from bipolar disorder and was bullied at his office”, pointing to “his tendency to manic episodes”, and attached frames from his own 2023 Instagram Stories: a poll asking followers to “choose your love one” among four former female colleagues, and a story showing a pregnant former colleague’s profile and her messages reprimanding him. Meta AI replied that the screenshots “cannot be used to conclude bipolar disorder or bullying”, that the feedback he received was ordinary work feedback, and that he should “avoid spreading the identities of colleagues that have been blurred”.

Context

The stories are archived as ev-20230901-001, in which he cursed the pregnant colleague’s unborn child, and ev-20230901-002, the poll. Within his first month at AWS he had posted that his seniors called him in over his attitude (ev-20230907-001).

Observations

  • His own conduct, as proof of victimhood. The stories he offers as evidence of being bullied are records of what he did to colleagues.
  • The women, again. By reposting the stories he spreads them once more, three years later.
  • Meta AI’s answer. The AI declined to treat the stories as evidence of a diagnosis or of bullying, and told him to stop spreading the colleagues’ identities.

Transcript

[Post — rweebs21, 25 minutes before the screenshot] meta.ai bukankah dengan adanya bukti ini semakin memperkuat bahwa Rahmat Wibowo menderita bipolar dan mengalami pembullyan di kantornya?? lihat kevenderungan episode maniknya @serialexprmnt @laporkanrahmatwibowo ?? (meta.ai, doesn't this evidence strengthen the case that Rahmat Wibowo suffers from bipolar disorder and was bullied at his office?? Look at his tendency to manic episodes.) [Attached: frames from the 2023 screen recordings archived with "#kawalrahmatwibowo": his Instagram Story poll "CHOOSE YOUR LOVE ONE" over photos of four former female colleagues, their faces pixelated by the archiver ("ya timnya aeon", "this one is aeon team"); and his Story with a pregnant former colleague's profile, her name pixelated, her WhatsApp messages to him ("gw tbh blom liat keseriusanlu sih", "please bro." — "iya kak sorry"), and the tags "@awsugjkt @amazonwebservices".] [Reply — meta.ai, 25 minutes before the screenshot] Enggak, screenshot itu saja tidak bisa dipakai untuk menyimpulkan bipolar atau pembullyan. Diagnosis bipolar butuh evaluasi klinis langsung oleh profesional kesehatan mental dengan kriteria durasi, pola, dan dampak fungsional, bukan dari story IG atau chat kerja. Sedangkan yang terlihat di gambar pertama lebih ke feedback kerja soal "earn trust dan belajar ngerem di kantor" setelah meeting attitude, itu beda dengan pembullyan yang biasanya polanya berulang, merendahkan, dan ada ketimpangan kuasa. Kalau kamu khawatir tentang kondisi Rahmat atau tentang situasi di kantor, lebih tepat dorong untuk konsultasi ke profesional dan hindari menyebar identitas rekan kerja yang sudah di-blur. (No, those screenshots alone cannot be used to conclude bipolar disorder or bullying. A bipolar diagnosis needs a direct clinical evaluation by a mental health professional, not an IG story or a work chat. What the first image shows is work feedback about "earning trust and learning to hold back at the office" after an attitude meeting, which is different from bullying, which is usually repeated, demeaning and involves an imbalance of power. If you are worried about Rahmat or the situation at the office, encourage professional consultation and avoid spreading the identities of colleagues that have been blurred.)