Rahmat Wibowo visited the address on Ibrahim Arief's trademark filing and called it 'fake', though his own slides say a boarding-house address is lawful

[YouTube video, "Kawal Ibam ke Penjara : Laporan Kunjungan EX CTO Pengecut Ternyata Alamat Palsu", 23 October 2026, 13 minutes. Excerpts from YouTube's automatic captions.] [0:00] Saya adalah korbannya si Ibangsat ini. ... saya tadi itu ke sana menggunakan alamat yang dapat ditemukan di ruang publik saat mendaftarkan hak merek (I am the victim of this Ibangsat. ... I went there today using the address that can be found publicly from when he registered a trademark) [1:00] Kesaksiannya adalah sang tersangka, terdakwa kasus tipikor Chromebook itu ternyata hanya ngekos di sono. Dan dia udah sebulan enggak di sana lagi. ... Dan yang punya itu adalah nenek-nenek yang sudah pikun. (The testimony is that the suspect, the defendant in the Chromebook corruption case, was only boarding there. And he hasn't been there for a month. ... And the owner is a senile old grandmother.) [2:00] Memakai kos atau kontrakan sebagai alamat pemohon merek sah selama alamat itu dihuni (Using a boarding room or rented house as a trademark applicant's address is lawful as long as the address is lived in) [5:00] Kos dan kontrakan adalah tempat yang sah dan jutaan orang tinggal di sana. Hukum meminta alamat, bukan kepemilikan rumah. Alamat mungkin akurat saat diajukan, lalu pemohon pindah. (Boarding rooms and rented houses are lawful places and millions of people live there. The law asks for an address, not home ownership. The address may have been accurate when filed, and then the applicant moved.) [7:00] Keterangan yang sengaja dibuat tidak benar dan kelalaian memperbarui. Yang pertama itu wilayah pidana yang serius, yang kedua soal ketelitian. (A deliberately false statement and a failure to update. The first is serious criminal territory, the second is a matter of diligence.)