Rahmat Wibowo, an alleged perpetrator of Sexual Harassment, showed his hypocrisy by hiding behind the presumption of innocence ('there is no history of sexual violence without a final court ruling') when a Threads user brought it up, while he himself routinely harasses his victims with accusations/allegations without a strong basis.

What he posted

He posted it at about 07:42 WIB on 22 October 2026, in reply to @brokenwall_oo, who had written that whatever the outcome of his police reports, “the history of sexual violence (‘ks’) remains”. He asked Meta AI to tell @brokenwall_oo that “there is no history of sexual violence without a final court ruling”, invoking the presumption of innocence and the principle that the one who asserts must prove.

Context

The “history” refers to his 2023 Instagram poll asking followers to choose among four former female colleagues (ev-20230901-002). In the same weeks he called Ibrahim Arief a “corruption convict” and “corruption defendant” without a final ruling (ev-20261009-001, ev-20261022-001).

Observations

• A standard for himself. He demands a final court ruling before anything is said about him.
• No such standard for others. He calls the people he targets “convicts”, “suspects” and “fraudsters” without any ruling, as in the entries linked above.
• The burden of proof. He cites the principle that the accuser must prove, while making accusations he does not prove.