Rahmat Wibowo published a legal dossier accusing an unregistered advocate and an anonymous network of coordinated harassment, defamation, and death threats, asserting his own credentials while framing opponents' documents as legally null and their conduct as criminal violations.

In the Matter of Rahmat Wibowo vs. Coordinated Harassment and Illegal Legal Practice Rahmat Wibowo - June1,2026 ya, ga ada bahan In the Matter of Rahmat Wibos vs. Coordinated Harassment and Mlegal Legal Practice An IT professional with state-issued civic credentials and academic certificationsconfronts an unregistered advocate and her harassment network Acloud engineerwith verifiable state and academic credentials vs. someone confirmed to not be a lawyer Rahmat Wibowo, Co-Founder and CEO of Infraloka (PT. Infrastruktur Digital Nusantara), ITB Information Systems alumnus Class of 2019, Djarum Beasiswa Plus scholar, holder of eight cloud certifications, and participant in academic forums convened by professors and doctors of Indonesia — faced a coordinated harassment campaign culminating ina legal notice signed by someone PERADI confirmed was never registered as an advocate. The opposing party issued a formal Abmahnung (German-language legal warning) and Surat Somasi purportedly from "Kantor Hukum Larasati Laras, $.H., M.H. & Rekan’ in Bekasi. PERADI Indonesia's national bar association, responded to Rahmat's complaint on 13 May 2026 confirming that no advocate by that name exists in their registry. The documents are legally null. The harassment campaign across WhatsApp. Twitter, and other platforms is fully documented below. Exhibit 1: Fomo direct messages — anonymous "awas" account, Mouseover The sender self-identifies as “Aurora,” directly linking the anonymous WhatsApp account to the public Twitter account @AuroraHigarana. Targeted personal abuse via private message (TOLOL, GOBLOK, CABUL) constitutes electronic harassment under Pasal 27 UU ITE No. 1/2024. The cross-platform link constitutes coordinated conduct Exhibit 2: @AuroraHigarana on Twitter — 118,700 impressions, public defamation “ee Public dissemination of statements designed to damage Rahmat's professional reputation at 118,700 impressions constitutes electronic defamation under Pasal 27A UU ITE No 1/2024. The account posts a screenshot of Rahmat's own private Instagram writing to mock it publicly, potentially engaging Pasal 26 UU ITE on unauthorized use of personal digital content. Reachis documented and measurable Exhibit 3 : Abmahnung, Aktenzeichen SOM/LHL/26/IV/13 — Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Larasati Hiragana Five fatal deficiencies: (1) issued by anon- advocate confirmed by PERADI:; (2) formatted as a German Abmahnung for Indonesian jurisdiction — no legal basis for this format under Indonesian procedural law; (3) contact addressis a Gmail account, not a professional legal domain; (4) no PERADI advocate registration number appears anywhere (5) allegations of death threats and stalking are unsubstantiated. Document is null ab initio. Exhibit 4 : Physical document packet — Surat Aduan to PERADI and Surat Somasi received by Rahmat The Surat Somasi precedes Rahmat's complaint chronologically (April vs. May 2026), establishing that Rahmat received the fraudulent notice first and then initiated PERADI proceedings. The PERADI confirmation followed on May 13. Chain of custody is intact and unbroken. Exhibit 5 : PERADI Surat Keterangan No. 004/S.Ket-DPN PERADI/V/2026 — 13 Mei 2026 PERADI Exhibit 6: MPRRI Certificate — Lomba Cerdas Cermat Empat Pilar, Provinsi DKI Jakarta lh Astate-issued certificate bearing the official seal of the People’s Consultative Assembly and four deputy chair signatures. It confirms Rahmat's civic achievement at national institutional level, his early academic standing, and his mastery of Indonesia's four constitutional pillars: Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Independently verifiable. Cannot be revoked by anonymous harassment. Exhibit 7 : Forum Guru Besar dan Doktor Insan Cita — Certificate No. 194, 2 Juni2026 Issued nine days before this dossier. Confirms Rahmatis an active participant in Indonesia's foremost academic legal community, engaging four full professors oncriminal and civil law questions at the intersection of transfer pricing and under-invoicing, The campaign's claim that Rahmat does not understand lawis directly refuted by this certificate and those that precede it. Exhibit 8 : Platform comment — threat to contact Rahmat's mother, impersonation of Assegaf Hamzah Three concurrent violations: (1) false claim of affiliation with Assegaf Hamzah and Partners, anamed and legitimate law frm, constitutes criminal misrepresentation; (2) obtaining and threatening to use Rahmat's mother's personal contact data without consent violates UU PDP. (Personal Data Protection Law); (3) directing future pressure through a family memberas coercion constitutes an offence under Pasal 335 KUHP. This is the most serious single exhibit in the series. Exhibit 9 : Platform comment — religious mockery, death language, personal attack This message compounds Exhibit 8 with: (1) mockery of Islamic religious identity (hasidin, "mengaku2 nabi," "tidak paham agama’), potentially engaging provisions onreligious hatred under KUHP; (2) the phrase “gali kubur sendiii" (dig your own grave) as a veiled death threat; (3) false statements of fact about academic and professional standing; (4) continued reference to Rahmat's motheras leverage. Together with Exhibit 8, this forms a sustained coercive campaign documented across multiple platforms within minutes. #Rahmat Wibowo #lllegal Practice Of Law #PERADI Verifed #LarasatiLaras #Aurora Higarana #Cyber Harassment #UUITE No 12024 #UU Advokat 18 Tahun 2003 #Infraloka #Bareskrim #Legal Accountability #Rahmata Lil Alamin