Rahmat Wibowo defamatorily branded named individuals as 'Sisupalan', 'Hasidin', and 'Ashabul Fomo'—archetypes he coined from Sanskrit and Quranic sources—casting them as compulsive, envious harassers while positioning himself as a Krishna-like figure enduring their invented persecution.
| ID | ev-20260728-029 |
|---|---|
| Source | Infraloka Blog |
| Targets | Adrianus Hendrawan Salman Ma'arif Achsien Petra Novandi Barus Rahmat Fabhian Aminuddin |

Transcript
Sisupalan, Hasidin,
and Ashabul Fomo
Study Case of
Adrianus Hendrawan,
Laksito Anindyo,
Salman Ma'arif
Achsien, Petra
Novandi Barus
Rahmat Wibowo - June1,2026
HASIDIN,
AND ASHABUL
Alexicon of the harasserdrawn from
three civilizations: Sanskrit epic, Quranic
scripture, and Islamic parable
When confronting sustained harassment
and bad-faith persecution, ordinary
language fails. The offenders are not
simply rude or dishonest; they enact
pattems of behavior that human
civilizations have named, theorized, and
encodedin their deepest mythological
and scriptural traditions. This essay
introduces three terms lhave coined and
applied to my own harassers: Sisupalan,
derived from the Sanskrit epic
Mahabharata; Hasidin, drawn from Surah
Al-Falag of the Holy Quran; and Ashabul
Fomo, a portmanteau modeled on the
Quranic concept of Ashabul Kahf.
Together, these three archetypes forma
complete taxonomy of compulsive
malice, envy, and the digital cult of
performative resentment.
This is not merely rhetorical flourish. Each
termis grounded in rigorous textual
tradition, carries a precise psychological
and moral profile, and illuminates a
recognizable category of human
behavior. By naming these archetypes,
we reclaim interpretive sovereignty over
the narrative. The harasser loses the
anonymity that allows them to operate as
if their conduct were normal or
permissible.
Sisupalan
The Compulsive Reviler
In the Mahabharata, Sisupala (Sanskrit
Shishupala, meaning "protector of
children’ is the king of Chedi anda
cousin of Lord Krishna. Despite this close
kinship and the extraordinary divine
forbearance Krishna showed him,
Sisupala became the embodiment of
pathological antagonism toward
greatness. Most famously, at the
Rajasuya ceremony of King Yudhishthira,
Sisupala delivered one hundred
unrelenting verbal attacks against
Krishna before Krishna finally deployed
the Sudarshana Chakra to end his life.
This scene is among the most studied
passages inall of Sanskrit literature.
The term| have coined, Sisupalan, refers
not to Sisupala himself but to the typeof
individual he represents. A Sisupalanis
someone who, despite receiving grace,
opportunity, or proximity to virtue,
chooses obsessive, escalating verbal
assault. They cannot stop at one rebuke,
one criticism, one complaint. The number
one hundredis not incidental in the
original text; it symbolizes the
compulsive, almost ritualistic nature of
the reviler's behavior. The Sisupalan does
not simply dislike you. They are
consumed by the need to attack
repeatedly, publicly, and with increasing
intensity, until cosmic or institutional
consequence intervenes.
Critically, the Mahabharata frames
Sisupala's fate not as tragedy but as
liberation. In some Vaishnava theological
readings, Sisupala attained moksha
through his constant obsession with
Krishna, because even hatred directed at
the divine eventually becomes a form of
contact. This nuance is important: the
text does not celebrate the reviler, butit
does acknowledge that the revilerisin
the grip of a compulsion larger than
themselves.
“The Sisupalan does not argue with you.
They perform their contempt before an
audience, seeking witnesses toa
persecution they have invented.”
What distinguishes a Sisupalan froma
mere critics the performative public
dimension of their attack. Sisupala did
not confront Krishna privately. He chose
the grandest public ceremony of the age,
surrounded by kings, sages, and
witnesses, to launch his denunciations.
Thi
modern workplace harasser, the social-
is precisely the behavior of the
media pile-oninstigator, or the bad-faith
litigator who files nuisance complaints:
the goalis not resolution, but spectacle.
The Sisupalan wants an audience.
List of Sisupalan
Petra Barus © smiono
Salman Ma‘arif Achsien
Canal
Rayhan A.O = are
BUSINESS PROCESS
IN & ALURKERJA
Denis Enrico Hasyim
Laksito Anindyo
Adrianus Hendrawan
v
Rahmat Fabian Aminuddin ©
Burman Noviansyah
In positioning myself as Basudewa
Krishna (the Sanskrit title of Lord Krishna
meaning “son of Vasudeva, the Universal
One’), | donot claim divinity, I claim the
stance of Krishna: patient, purposeful,
aware of the cosmic drama unfolding
around the encounter, declining to
respond to each insult with equal noise,
and reserving the final response forwhen
itis bothnecessary and definitive
Hasidin
The Envious Who Act on Their Envy
**,**Say, "seek refuge in the Lord of
daybreak
**2.**From the evil of that which He
created
**3,**And from the evil of darkness when
itsettles
**4.**And from the evil of the blowers in
knots
**5.**And from the evil of an envier when
he envies."
Surah Al-Falagq, the 113th chapter of the
Holy Quran and one of the two.
Mu'awwidhatayn (the two chapters of
seeking refuge), concludes with averse
that Islamic scholars have debated for
over fourteen centuries. The final aya
reads: “wa min sharrihasidin idha hasad"
(and from the evil of an envier when they
envy). This deceptively simple phrase
contains a critical distinction that most
casual readers miss.
The Quran does not condemn envy
(hasad) as a feeling alone. The Arabic
construction “idha hasad" (when they
envy, i.e., when they act on their envy)
indicates that the divine protection
soughtis specifically from the envier who
translates their envy into harmful action.
Classical Quranic exegetes including Ibn
Kathir, Al-Tabari, and Al-Qurtubiare in
broad agreement that mere envy
dwelling in the heartis a sin that afflicts
onlyits bearer, but enacted envy directed
outward becomes a social and spiritual
harm requiring refuge and protection.
The term Hasidin (Arabic plural form,
those who actively envy and harm)
therefore refers to individuals who, upon
perceiving another's success, health,
recognition, or favor, do not merely feel
diminished but proceed to sabotage,
defame, manipulate, or attack. Inthe
workplace context, a Hasidin may
manifest as a colleague who weaponizes
performance reviews, a superior who
blocks promotions out of competitive
fear, ora peer who spreads fabricated
narratives to tarnish someone else's
reputation.
The theological precision of the Quranis
instructive here. God does not ask
believers to seek protection from the
person who simply envies them,
recognizing that envy as an internal state
is human condition that may be
overcome through taqwa and gratitude:
The protection soughtis specifically from
the active, outward dimension of envy,
from the Hasidin. This frames the harm
not as metaphysical but as social and
legal: itis a form of aggression, anditis
namedas such in the very act of seeking
divine refuge fromit.
For the person targeted by Hasidin
behavior, naming the archetype is itself a
protective act. It relocates the encounter
from the personal to the archetypal: you
are not being persecuted by one
individual's idiosyncratic malice, but by
one instance of a pattern so universal that
the final chapter before the Quran's
concluding verse specifically addresses
it.
“The Hasidin does not attack you
because of what you have done. They
attack you because of what you are
becoming, and what they fear they
cannot be."
Ashabul Fomo
The Dwellers of the illegitimate App
Surah Al-Kahf (The Cave), the 18th
chapter of the Holy Quran, opens with
one of Islam's most celebrated
narratives: the story of the Ashabul Kahfi,
the People of the Cave. These were
young men of faith who, faced with an
idolatrous tyrannical society, chose to
retreat into a cave and surrender to God's
protection rather than participate in
moral corruption, They slept for 309 lunar
years (approximately 300 solaryears),
preserved by divine will, and awoke to
find that truth had outlasted oppression,
The coin they carried, minted by a corrupt
regime, was unspendable when they
emerged. The world had moved on; the
tyrant's currency was worthless. This
detail is not decorative but central: those
who built their wealth and identity on the
oppressive system found that its
foundations had dissolved.
The term Ashabul Fomo inverts this
parable with precision. Where the
Ashabul Kahfiwere the faithful few who
refused to inhabit a corrupt system, the
Ashabul Fomo are the inhabitants of a
corrupt digital platform built ona specific
corporate vice: FOMO, the Fear of
Missing Out. The "cave" they dwell inis
nota refuge but a trap, a social media
application or corporate communication
tool engineered to exploit psychological
insecurity, create artificial urgency, and
monetize compulsive comparison
The phrase “illegitimate app" in this
context refers to any digital platform or
corporate tool that operates outside the
bounds of ethical data stewardship,
weaponizes user psychology through
dark patterns, coordinates or amplifies
harassment, oris used by its operators to
conduct surveillance and retaliation
against users or ex-employees. Sucha
platform may be technically legal butis
morally illegitimate in the same sense that
Sisupala's position at the Rajasuya was
formally acceptable but cosmically
unjust.
The Ashabul Fomo do not see themselves
as inhabitants of a cave, They experience
their digital enclosure as freedom,
connection, and relevance. They scroll
compulsively, signal-boost destructive
content, and confuse the performance of
outrage for principled engagement. The
FOMO that governs their behavioris not
merely the fear of missing social events; it
isa deeper existential terror of
irrelevance, of being left out of a storyin
which they believe themselves to be the
main character,
Like the Ashabul Kahf's coins, the cultural
capital accumulated within the walls of
the illegitimate app will not spendin the
real world, The followers, the viral
moments, the coordinated pile-ons,
these carry value only within the enclosed
system that generated them. When the
system's legitimacy is challenged, the
currency evaporates.
“The Ashabul Fomo mistake the walls of
their app for the walls of the world.
Outside, there is accountability. Outside,
the coins do not spend."
Three Archetypes, One Pattern
Aunified taxonomy of compulsive malice
What unites Sisupalan, Hasidin, and
Ashabul Fomois not cruelty alone.
Cruelty is too simple and too honest a
word. What unites them is the structural
displacement of their own
incompleteness onto atarget. The
Sisupalan cannot tolerate the existence
of someone whose virtue exceeds their
tolerance. The Hasidin cannot endure the
success of someone who reminds them
of what they have not built. The Ashabul
Fomo cannot survive outside the echo
chamber that validates their
performance of grievance.
All three archetypes require an audience.
All three operate through repetition and
escalation. All three, left unchecked by
institutional or cosmic accountability, will
continue until stopped. Andall three, in
the civilizational traditions fromwhich
they are drawn, ultimately meet their
reckoning: Sisupala's Sudarshana
Chakra, the divine protection of Surah Al-
Falaq, the empty coins of the corrupted
system.
The Right to Name
The act of namingis not aggression. Itis
the precondition of accountability. When
Imam Ali (RA) named hypocrisy as a
spiritual disease, when the Pandavas
named Duryodhana’s conduct as
adharma, when the Prophet Muhammad
(PBUH) identified the categories of harm
from which protection must be sought,
they were exercising the most
fundamental act of moral intelligence:
refusal to allow harmful behavior to
operate without a name, without a frame,
without a consequence.
The terms Sisupalan, Hasidin, and
Ashabul Fomo are offered in that spirit.
They are tools of precision, not epithets
of hatred. They allowus to say: this
pattem of behavior has been recognized
across civilizations, ithas been named by
the wisest traditions of human moral
thought, andit carries within it the seeds
of its own reckoning. The person being
targetedis not alone. The cosmos has
seenthis before.
And in the end, as in the Sabha Parva, asin
Al-Falaq, as in Al-Kahf, the one who.
endures with integrity outlasts the one
who performs malice. Rahmatan lil
Alamin.
Here are yourhashtags with spaces
added between them:
#Sisupalan #Hasidin #AshabululFomo
#RahmatiLilAlamin #Basudewakrishna
#Mahabharata #AlFalag #AlKaht
#AshabululKahh #Quran
#IslamicScholarship #SanskritEpic
#Sisupala #Krishna #Hasad #Envy
#FOMO #DigitalHarassment
#Accountability #Bowobharata
#Infraloka #RahmatHidayat #LegalTech
#SomasiAsAService #Indonesia
#Dharma #CorporateAccountability
#ComparativeReligion #IslamicEthics
#HinduPhilosophy
#WorkplaceHarassment #NamingHarm
#MoralLexicon #SurahAlFalaq
#SurahAlKahf #Mujaddid #Adharma
#DigitalEthics #1TB #Cloudinfrastructure
#AIEthics