Rahmat Wibowo Serial Online Harassment Actor — Case Dossier
This site is a public service for at least 82 victims of harassment, insults, accusations and defamation by Rahmat Wibowo. We archive all of Rahmat Wibowo's social media content (X, Threads, LinkedIn, Instagram). We cannot defame a name that Rahmat Wibowo has already tarnished by his own actions, but we work to protect the good names of at least 82 victims.

Rahmat Wibowo published Steven Nataniel Kodyat's reply to his somasi as a YouTube 'study case' of AI-written legal responses, declaring that by calling his post sarcasm Steven had admitted criminal intent and that 'Article 433 is already proven'

IDev-20260722-001
SourceRahmat Wibowo YouTube
Modus operandiLegal Threats and Extortion Manipulation of Public Opinion
Documentsdoc-20260428-001
TargetsSteven Nataniel Kodyat

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo published Steven Nataniel Kodyat's reply to his somasi as a YouTube 'study case' of AI-written legal responses, declaring that by calling his post sarcasm Steven had admitted criminal intent and that 'Article 433 is already proven'

Commentary

He published it on YouTube on 22 July 2026. Minute links open the video at that point.

  • A reply to his somasi, made public. He presents “a study case of me versus Steven Nataniel Kodyat”, “not for defamation, for learning”, built on the written response Steven sent to his somasi, which he shows and quotes on screen (minute 0, 4–5). The essay argues that the response, which he says was drafted with AI, was “a near complete gift to the opposing party”, that is, to himself (minute 5).
  • “Article 433 is already proven.” Because Steven’s response called his post sarcastic criticism protected by free expression, Rahmat declares that this is an admission of criminal intent: “sarcasm is designed to hurt or demean, my God, Steven, Article 433 is already proven” (minute 6–7). He had published the same case-study essay in June.

Transcript

[YouTube video, "When Algorithms Play Lawyer : Rahmat Wibowo VS Steven Nataniel Kodyat", 22 July 2026, 13 minutes. Excerpts from YouTube's automatic captions.] [0:00] this is a study case of me versus Steven Nataniel Kodyat. Both of us have a dispute ... this is a real one and this is not for defamation, this is for the analysis for learning [6:00] sarkasme dirancang untuk melukai atau merendahkan ya ampun Steven pasal 433 sudah terbukti ya guys ya. (sarcasm is designed to hurt or demean, my God, Steven, Article 433 is already proven, guys.) [7:00] So he stated that his action is a sarcasm against me ... that's the mens rea because he deliberately said that it is a sarcasm

Related evidence

Other posts from Rahmat Wibowo's accounts connected to this incident by target, theme, or sequence.