Rahmat Wibowo published a video 'Rahmat Wibowo From Infraloka vs Raihan Aqilah Setiawan From Material Raqil', reading out an AI 'devil's advocate' report that scored himself 8.2 and the science creator 5.2, with his own claims 'treated as true'

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo published a video 'Rahmat Wibowo From Infraloka vs Raihan Aqilah Setiawan From Material Raqil', reading out an AI 'devil's advocate' report that scored himself 8.2 and the science creator 5.2, with his own claims 'treated as true'

Commentary

He published it on YouTube on 3 July 2026. Minute links open the video at that point.

  • “Me versus Raihan Aqil Setiawan.” He introduces himself with his ITB intake and “3.91 GPA” and presents “me versus Raihan Aqil Setiawan, the man behind Material Raqil”, a materials science content creator, through a “deep research devil’s advocate comparative report” (minute 0).
  • A contest scored in his favour. The report he reads out says his own expertise claims are “treated as true and evidence ready” (minute 2–3), while Raihan’s content on oxo-degradable plastics is a “systemic public communication risk” (minute 7). It scores Rahmat 8.2 and Raihan 5.2 and concludes that “Rahmat leads under adversarial scoring” and “his claims are established” (minute 4, 12). He closes: “Material Raqil, please do your diligence” (minute 13).
  • The next day. He followed it with a video calling Raihan “just a buzzer”.

Transcript

[YouTube video, "Rahmat Wibowo From Infraloka vs Raihan Aqilah Setiawan From Material Raqil", 3 July 2026, 14 minutes. Excerpts from YouTube's automatic captions.] [0:00] I was once eh graduate from ITB majoring in information system and technology batch 2019 with 3.91 GPA. And ya, this is me versus Raihan Aqil Setiawan. The man behind Material Raqil ... This is the deep research devil's advocate comparative report. [2:00] Rahmat's expertise claims are in this report as true and evidence ready [4:00] composite score 8.2, 5.2. Rahmat holds the stronger comparative record on visible technical operating evidence [12:00] Rahmat leads under adversarial scoring. Final comparative verdict. ... Rahmat has the stronger visible operating tech case and his claims are established. [13:00] So, this is me versus Material Raqil. Material Raqil. Please do your diligence.