Rahmat Wibowo defiantly asserted that Liven's criminal defamation warning against him is legally hollow, arguing that Indonesian law protects only individuals, and questioned the company's competence for delivering the threat without any lawyer present.
| ID | ev-20260626-007 |
|---|---|
| Source | Rahmat Wibowo LinkedIn |
| Targets | Shahrooz Chowdhury |

Transcript
@ Rahmat Wibowo mm
aw
| was warned by Liven ( PT NOMNIE
TECHNOLOGIES INDONESIA) about
corporate defamation.
In my opinion, they have no idea what the law
actually says.
Here is the thing: under UU No. 1 Tahun 2023
(KUHP Nasional), Pasal 433, criminal
defamation only protects individual human
beings. A corporation cannot be the victim of
criminal defamation. Full stop. The
Mahkamah Konstitusi confirmed this in
Putusan No. 105/PUU-XXil/2024, barring
companies from filing defamation complaints
entirely.
So what exactly are they threatening me
with? You cannot criminally defame a
company under Indonesian law as it currently
stands. The threat has no legal foundation.
What makes this more telling is how it
happened. There was no lawyer in the room.
No legal counsel present on their side. Just
the country manager and the HRBP ,
Salsabila Meidiana Putri delivering what they
framed as a mercy, a concession, a kindness
extended to me. Now, i'm questioning if they
have a legal team in hand.
That framing alone says everything.
When a legal threat is delivered without a
lawyer, by someone who is not trained in law,
itis not professionalism. It is noise dressed
up as authority. A verdict issued by someone
without jurisdiction over the subject they are
pronouncing on.
Ido not say this with bitterness. | say it as
someone who has read the statute.
If you are going to warn a former employee
about defamation law, bring someone who
knows what defamation law says. Otherwise
you are not protecting your company. You are
exposing how little your process trusts its
own foundations.
To any professional in Indonesia who has
faced a similar situation: know that a
company threatening you with criminal
defamation has no standing to do so under
the current legal framework. The law
changed. They may not have noticed,
The legal reality
Pasal 433 UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 - Criminal
defamation protects individuals only. A
corporation issuing a defamation warning
against a former employee has no criminal
law standing, The threat is legally hollow.
The corporate defamations case from what |
heard by the country manager, which | won't
mentioned with respect of his willingness of
good faith was requested by the duo co-ceo
Shahrooz Chowdhury and William Wong
#IndonesiaLaw #KUHP #HukumPidana
#UUNo1Tahun2023 #WorkerRights
#KebebasanBerekspresi #Infraloka
#Professionalism #HukumKetenagakerjaan