Rahmat Wibowo accused three KORIKA senior figures of coordinating his unlawful expulsion from community channels to suppress fraud disclosure, citing alleged criminal and civil violations, combining sweeping accusation with reputational attack.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo accused three KORIKA senior figures of coordinating his unlawful expulsion from community channels to suppress fraud disclosure, citing alleged criminal and civil violations, combining sweeping accusation with reputational attack.

Transcript

Complete Blacklist of KORIKA PT Bahasa Kita WKI Wireline Logging and Perforation On 14 June 2026, three senior administrators of KORIKA (Komunitas Riset Kecerdasan Artifisial) coordinated the simultaneous removal of a paid member from all four community channels ina single day. No notice. No stated reason. No appeal. The trigger? The member publicly exposed fraud by a KORIKA-affiliated figure. Here is what the legal analysis found: 3 defendants acting in concert 4 groups expulsion executed across (KORIKA-IMPACT Hankam, KORIKA-IMPACT Kesehatan, KORIKA WhatsApp, KORIKA- Members Club) 8 legal articles violated (5 criminal, 3 civil) The defendants are not minor moderators. They are senior institutional figures: - Oskar Riandi (PT Bahasa Kita | KORIKA | JAIST) — likely co-founder/director ~ Suryadiputra Liawatimena (Binus ASO | Universitas Bina Nusantara) — academic community builder ~ T. Indra Kesuma (WKI Wireline Logging and Perforation | INSEAD) — operations gatekeeper of the Members Club Three people. Four channels. One target. One date. That is not coincidence. That is coordination. KORIKA membership is not a social perk. It is a gateway to Indonesia's Al venture capital ecosystem and government policy channels. Expulsion without cause inflicts real professional and economic harm. The legal exposure mapped: ~ Pasal 20 KUHP: Joint commission as co- perpetrators ~ Pasal 21 KUHP: Aiding fraud by suppressing its exposure - Pasal 433/434 KUHP: Defamation by implication ~ Pasal 441 KUHP: Digital aggravation (+1/3 penalty, mandatory) ~ Pasal 1838 KUH Perdata: Breach of membership contract ~ Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata: Unlawful act causing documented damage ~ Pasal 1372 KUH Perdata: Civil defamation, compensation and name restoration Probability of high-severity outcome (active sentence or large civil damages): 40%. Most likely single verdict: Suspended sentence under Pasal 433 and 441 (18%). Statute of limitations for civil defamation claim: 14 June 2027. To every professional in Indonesia's Al ecosystem: accountability is not optional. Paid membership creates binding contracts. Coordinated expulsion to suppress fraud disclosure is not community governance. It is unlawful retaliation, Full legal risk report and evidence documentation available. ‘Tagging relevant stakeholders for awareness and accountability: DPR Commission | The House of Representatives, Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) Utut Adianto Budisatrio Djiwandono Danantara Indonesia Pandu Sjahrir Dony Oskaria GDP Labs / GDP Venture On Lee Martin Hartono #KORIKA #Allndonesia #HukumDigital #UUITEIndonesia #RahmatWibowo #LegalRiskAnalysis #Artificialintelligence #KecerdasanArtifisial #FraudExposure #infraloka #IndonesiaTech #KUHP2023 #KUHPerdata #PencemaranNamaBaik #Linkedinindonesia #Bowobharata