Rahmat Wibowo falsely accused Aqilah Saffanah and Petra Barus of operating an anonymous 'awas' account to run a harassment, defamation, doxxing, and fabricated legal document campaign against him, claiming a police report was filed, advancing the accusation and defamation despite the absence of any strong supporting evidence.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo falsely accused Aqilah Saffanah and Petra Barus of operating an anonymous 'awas' account to run a harassment, defamation, doxxing, and fabricated legal document campaign against him, claiming a police report was filed, advancing the accusation and defamation despite the absence of any strong supporting evidence.

Transcript

THE FILES THE AWAS FILES: -- How Agilah Saffanah and Petra Barus Become Comes Under Suspicion Rahmat Wibowo GFotiow ) g@ CEO |GenZ|AlNative ~~ Engineer! IT Digital Unmasking the Anonymous Account Behind a Campaign of Harassment, Defamation, and Fabricated Legal Documents An anonymous forum account operating under the handle "awas" spent months running a coordinated harassment campaign targeting a named individual, all while positioning itself as a righteous whistleblower. The evidence tells a different story -- one of doxxing, fabricated legal documents, identity impersonation, and a network of real actors hiding behind digital anonymity. A Self-Proclaimed Crusader With a Hypocrite's Playbook The account known as "awas" presented itself to the Indonesian tech forum community as a moral authority a whistleblower protecting the public from dangerous individuals. Its posts called out others for alleged harassment, spread supposed evidence of wrongdoing, and urged the community to blacklist its target. It claimed to operate with a "legal team." It used the collective "kami" (we/us) to project institutional weight. But a closer look at the documented evidence reveals a pattern of behavior that mirrors and in many ways exceeds the very misconduct the account claimed to be fighting against. The forum posts by "awas" are riddled with personal attacks, fabricated accusations, doxxing of private individuals, and the circulation of fake legal documents designed to intimidate and defame. Behind the Mask: Agilah Saffanah and Petra Barus BINCANG-BINCANG KARIR ANAK OLIMPIADE Portrait of Petra Barus For weeks, "awas" maintained the illusion of anonymity. The account used a generic avatar, refused to identify itself, and mocked the target's attempts to determine who was behind it. But the evidence trail left by the operators ultimately gave them away. <99 Agilah lu ke rumah w lagl yaa udah gue tetep mau ketemu sih mau minta maaf dgn bener ken lu udh lapor gue izin block lagi ya P Tue, 5 May aneh biir sia irene The admission is significant. By claiming sole ownership of the account while also claiming credit for the mocking stickers stickers whose source images were sent by Petra Novandi's WhatsApp contact. The operator inadvertently confirmed the connection between the two identities. "Ya er eu arbre Simao ic he irony is sharp: while the "awas" account ridiculed its target for suggesting there might be multiple people behind the campaign, the cross- platform evidence linking Agilah and Petra Novandi suggests exactly that kind of coordinated operation, even if only one person technically administered the forum account. The Harassment Toolkit: Defamation, Doxxing, and Fake Legal Documents 1. Coordinated Blacklisting and Career Destruction Sedikit tambahan tentang The post captioned "Sedikit tambahan tentang #KawalRahmat" openly celebrated getting the target blacklisted from Indonesian and Singaporean tech forums, kicked from alumni groups, and allegedly placed on HR blacklists across industries. The author boasted of personally contacting HR departments in Singapore to ensure the information spread. Calling this a "clapping back" campaign does not change its character under Indonesian law -- systematic coordination to destroy a person's livelihood constitutes harassment and potentially tortious interference. Evidence: Forum Post -- Career Destruction Campaign “Confirmed dari industri tech sampai agribisnis, YBS sudah diblacklist. | doubt he can find any job in Indonesia (yang ga berhubungan dengan kepemerintahan)" 2. Public Mocking Using Private Images Among the most disturbing documented behaviors is the deliberate use of screenshots showing a person in visible emotional distress -- crying, distraught - - as mocking material posted publicly to a forum. These images originated in private communications and were repurposed as "stickers" to humiliate the target. This constitutes a serious violation of Indonesia's UU PDP (Personal Data Protection Law) and may rise to the level of psychological abuse under applicable regulations. 3. Fabricated Legal Documents One of the most serious pieces of evidence in this investigation is Image 6: a formal-looking "Abmahnung" (legal warning letter) bearing the letterhead of "Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Larasati Hiragana, S.H., M.H. & Partner," purportedly operating out of Bekasi, West Java. The document contains grave accusations against the target, including allegations of death threats, cyberstalking, and sexual harassment. However, "Larasati Hiragana" has been confirmed as not registered with PERADI -- the Indonesian Advocates Association that maintains the official registry of licensed legal practitioners. The use of a fake attorney letterhead to issue threats and accusations is itself a criminal offense under Indonesian law, and the document's sophisticated formatting suggests deliberate intent to deceive. Evidence: Fabricated Document Detail Letterhead: “Larasati Hiragana, S.H., M.H. & Partner | Bekasi, West- Java | larasatilaras.law@gmail. com" Note the use of a Gmail address for what purports to be a licensed law firm -- a significant red flag. Legitimate Indonesian law firms use professional domain email addresses. PERADI verification: No registration found. 4. Verbal Harassment and Threats SalhorangTOLOL Soyaaurera HAHAHAHAMHA pra2pntar tai GOBLOK tps itercomsAuroraHigaanalsttus/1731849177653452873? {Ac WES:HNRMURNKQCZSIgsn19 Direct messages attributed to "Aurora" - - another pseudonym linked to this network -- sent via WhatsApp include statements such as "Salah orang TOLOL," "HAHAHAHAHHA pura? pintar tapi GOBLOK," and a demand to "unblock" a Twitter account alongside the label "dasar orang CABUL" (essentially calling the target obscene/perverse). These messages, timestamped and screenshotted, constitute harassment under UU ITE No. 1/2024. Anti-Harassment Rhetoric, Pro- Harassment Action Perhaps the most striking aspect of this case is the "awas" account's self- positioning as a defender of harassment victims. The post ends with the rallying cry: "Semangat terus pejuang pejuang kebenaran" "Keep fighting, warriors of truth." Yet the documented conduct of this account includes: gleefully celebrating a man's professional destruction across multiple industries; posting private distress images as public mockery; circulating a fake legal document accusing someone of death threats and sexual harassment; sending abusive direct messages; and maintaining a dedicated anti-target forum community. The account that branded itself a champion of harassment victims became one of the most sustained harassers in this case and did so under the cover of moral righteousness. The "awas" post also contains a revealing closing line addressed to the target's CEO with affection emojis, promising to support their company “sampai bangkrut" until bankruptcy. This is not the language of a legitimate whistleblower. It is the language of someone with a personal vendetta weaponizing community outrage. What the Law Says The conduct documented in this report potentially engages multiple provisions of Indonesian law. Under UU ITE No. 1/2024, knowingly distributing false information that harms a person's reputation carries criminal penalties. The fabrication of a legal document using a fake attorney identity exposes the author to fraud and impersonation charges. The coordinated blacklisting campaign may constitute tortious interference. The unauthorized use and publication of private images of a person in emotional distress may violate UU PDP (Personal Data Protection Law No. 27/2022). The WhatsApp messages from "Aurora" including the phrase directing the target to "unblock" a blocked account under threat of being called obscene may constitute criminal harassment under Article 335 KUHP 2023 and Article 45B UUITE. A formal report has been filed with Bareskrim Polri. The identities of Agilah Saffanah and Petra Barus, cross- confirmed through independent digital evidence chains, form a core part of the investigative record. Here are your hashtags with spaces added between each one: #KawalRahmat #AwasHypocrisy #AqilahUnmasked #PetraNovandiExposed #PetraBarusExposed #LarasatiHiragana #FakeLawFirm #DigitalHarassment #IndonesiaCybercrime #UUITEViolation #UUPDP #Bareskrim #AnonymousAccountExposed #OnlineHarassmentindonesia #DoxxingAlert #FakeAdvocate #PERADI #DigitalEvidence #CyberStalking #DefamasiOnline #infralokaBerkaca