Rahmat Wibowo published a LinkedIn article accusing Salman Ma'arif Achsien and Rayhan Maheswara Pramanda — younger ITB STI 2021 cohort colleagues — of Dunning-Kruger arrogance and disrespect toward seniors, framing their pushback against him as incompetent overconfidence.
| ID | ev-20260607-021 |
|---|---|
| Source | Rahmat Wibowo LinkedIn |
| Targets | Salman Ma'arif Achsien Rayhan Maheswara Pramanda |


Transcript
When confidence ---
outpaces
competence: the
Dunning-Kruger
problem among Gen
Z , Study case of
Salman Mal‘arif
Achsien and Rayhan
Maheswara
Pramanda
Rahmat Wibowo (+ Follow
Engineer] IT Digital
There is a quiet but growing tension in
Indonesian professional and academic
circles. And when seniors speak up, they
are called the toxic ones.
Junior professionals and students,
armed with smartphones, Al tools, and
the confidence of youth, are increasingly
dismissing the experience and insight of
their seniors. And when called out, they
label the senior as the toxic one. This is
not a generational attack. This is a
professional accountability conversation
we need to have.
The case that made me write this
| recently made a formal decision to
publicly distance myself from a group of
younger colleagues from the STI 2021
cohort at ITB, a group whose leader
exhibited a textbook pattern of Dunning-
Kruger behavior across multiple serious
domains: mental health, legal discourse,
and technology.
What happened
They were consistently rude to me, a
senior by two years, dismissing my
perspective without engagement.
When | raised substantive points, they
leaned on Al tools to counter me. The
problem was not the tools. It was their
lack of foundational knowledge to
prompt them correctly or recognize
hallucinations. The result was a
confident presentation of inaccurate
arguments.
After | openly disclosed that | live with
mental health challenges, they
continued attacking me publicly ina
WhatsApp group of over 500 members.
When | named what they were doing,
they called me toxic. Their leader, given
the opportunity to de-escalate, chose
pride over reconciliation for a community
of over 150 people.
They were radicalized by a lecturer who
used me as a bad example across three
chapters of a professional course,
without any due process or right of
reply.
That is not youth. That is a failure of
character.
"His ego is so high that he is willing to
sacrifice the entire batch of more than
150 people just to avoid saying sorry."
What the Dunning-Kruger effect actually
means
First documented by psychologists
David Dunning and Justin Kruger in
1999, this cognitive bias describes how
people with limited knowledge in a
domain significantly overestimate their
own competence. The less someone
knows, the more confident they feel,
because they lack the very awareness
needed to recognize the gaps in their
understanding.
We used to say "GK TAU SOK TAU GK
MAU TAU." Does not know, acts like it
knows, refuses to find out. This
generation did not invent that pattern.
But some of them are running it at scale.
This is also a structural problem
When educators normalize disrespect
for seniors by turning them into
cautionary tales without due process,
they plant seeds of contempt. When
institutions allow toxic group dynamics
to flourish in closed messaging groups
without accountability, they create
environments where mob behavior is
rewarded.
Gen Z did not invent arrogance. But they
are growing up in an environment that
makes it very easy to perform expertise,
dismiss dissent, and retreat into digital
safety when confronted with someone
who knows more.
What professionalism actually requires
Real competence is quiet. It listens
before it speaks. It asks questions
before it makes declarations. It holds
space for the possibility that someone
with more experience might have
something valuable to offer, even if that
person is difficult, imperfect, or going
through something hard.
“Professionalism also requires the
courage to say: | was wrong. | escalated
when | should have listened. | owe you
an apology."
That courage is not weakness. It is the
foundation of everything else.
A final word
| do not write this to shame a generation.
| write this because | have spent years
building, fighting, contributing, and
showing up, and | refuse to be gaslit into
believing that speaking up about
disrespect is itself the problem.
If you are a junior professional reading
this: your tools are powerful. Your
confidence is an asset. But please, learn
the difference between speed and
depth. Between fluency and
understanding. Between sounding right
and being right. Your seniors are not
your enemies. Some of them are exactly
who you will need when the real
challenges arrive.
And if you are a senior who has
experienced this: you are not alone.
Document it. Name it clearly. And hold
the standard, not out of ego, but
because the standard matters.
Respect is not optional in a professional
community. It is the infrastructure
everything else runs on.
ange
beens
#Blacklist hashtag #STI2021 hashtag
#ProfessionalBoundaries hashtag
#RespectSeniors hashtag
#MentalHealthAwareness hashtag
#Accountability hashtag
#DunningKruger hashtag
#ProfessionalEthics hashtag
#Leadership hashtag #NoTolerance