Rahmat Wibowo published an article highlighting inconsistencies in the foreign degree claims of Abil Sudarman (Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman) and Marchel Shevchenko, framing them as symptoms of Indonesia's unverifiable foreign credential system, casting doubt on their qualifications without independently verified evidence.
| ID | ev-20260607-020 |
|---|---|
| Source | Rahmat Wibowo LinkedIn |
| Targets | Abil Sudarman (Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman) Marchel Shevchenko |

Transcript
Indonesia's Blind Spot:
‘The Foreign Degree Loophole
That Lets Fraud Thrive in
Plain Sight
Indonesia's Blind —---
Spot: The Foreign
Degree Loophole
That Lets Fraud
Thrive in Plain Sight,
Abil Sudarman and
Marchel
Shevchenko
Rahmat Wibowo +Follow )
When a degree comes from abroad,
Indonesia's entire verification
infrastructure goes silent. The Abil
Sudarman and Marchel Shevchenko
case is not the problem. It is the
symptom.
There is a crack in Indonesia's education
credentialing system wide enough to
drive a career through. And it has been
there for years, largely ignored by the
very ministry whose job it is to close it.
Let us talk about what happened with
Abil Sudarman and Marchel
Shevchenko.
The Abil Sudarman Case: A Mirror for a
Systemic Problem
€ (search
Education (3)
University of London
weary Computer Science, Computer Science (Al/ML}
Third-Party
Inquiry: Abil S.
Dear Academic Awards and Verification Tea
ABIGAIL ARYAPUTRA SUDARMAN
operates the "Abi n
prominently
Abil Sudarman, whose full name is
Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman, rose to
significant public prominence in 2026.
He built an Al-powered procurement
monitoring dashboard called Nemesis
Assai, received coverage from major
outlets including Tempo.co, and
positioned himself publicly as an Al
expert, career counselor, Executive
Director at KORIKA (Kolaborasi Riset dan
Inovasi Industri Al Indonesia), a UNESCO.
Al project manager, and a Responsible
Al Fellow at the Stimson Center in
Washington D.C.
His public profiles listed his education as
Computer Science at the University of
London.
Other sources cited the University of
Liverpool.
There is a difference between those two
institutions. They are not the same.
university. The University of London is a
federated system encompassing
multiple colleges. The University of
Liverpool is a separate, standalone
Russell Group institution ranked in the
top 150 globally by QS World University
Rankings 2026. These are not
interchangeable, and casually swapping
them in a professional profile is, at the
very minimum, a red flag worth
scrutinizing.
Now here is the question that exposes
the real problem: Can you verify whether
Abil Sudarman actually graduated from
either of those institutions through any
Indonesian government system?
Also Marchel Shevchenko claim he was
a research student at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology
Marchel Shevchenko
[IML Researcher & Developer | Founder @Data Sorcerers | Compute
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Research Student, Computer Science
4 - Present
PDDIKTI: Excellent for Domestic Degrees,
Silent on Foreign Ones
Indonesia's Pangkalan Data Pendidikan
Tinggi, or PDDIKTI, is genuinely
impressive for what it was designed to
do. Any employer, institution, or member
of the public can visit
pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id and search for
a student by name, student number,
institution, or study program. The
system returns graduate status, study
period, and degree information for every
registered Indonesian higher education
graduate. It is free, publicly accessible,
and relatively comprehensive for
domestic institutions.
The moment the claimed degree comes
from a foreign university, however,
PDDIKTI goes completely dark.
There is no searchable database of
foreign degree holders in Indonesia.
There is no integration between the
domestic PDDIKTI system and foreign
credential verification. An employer in
Jakarta cannot go to any single
government portal and confirm that
someone who claims a degree from the
University of Liverpool, the University of
Manchester, RMIT, or Cornell actually
holds that credential.
This is the gap that fraud walks through
every single day.
A Degree Equivalency System That Exists
But Is Not Enforced
To be fair to Kementerian Pendidikan
Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi
(Kemendiktisaintek), a foreign degree
equivalency process does exist. It is
called Penyetaraan |jazah Luar Negeri,
managed through the portal
piln.kemdiktisaintek.go.id. The process
requires submitting a colored scan of
the original diploma, an academic
transcript, passport pages from the
study period, a Letter of Acceptance
from the foreign university, accreditation
documents from the institution abroad,
and a curriculum or syllabus from the
program attended.
When completed, the applicant receives
a Surat Keputusan Penyetaraan, an
official government decree confirming
that the foreign degree is recognized
and equivalent to an Indonesian
qualification at the appropriate level.
This sounds thorough. On paper, it
should solve the problem.
In practice, it does not, because the
process is voluntary.
“Urgensi proses ini
dikembalikan kepada
masing-masing individu
disesuaikan dengan
kebutuhannya."Official
language from
Kemendiktisaintek on the
equivalency process
Translation: the urgency of this process
is left to each individual based on their
own needs.
There it is. Indonesia's government built
an equivalency system, made it optional,
and then wondered why credential fraud
involving foreign degrees is difficult to
detect.
The prestige halo is the fraud vector.
The more internationally renowned the
institution, the higher the probability
that the claim goes unchallenged.
If you claim Harvard, MIT, Cambridge, or
Liverpool, the average Indonesian
recruiter is less likely to verify because
the name itself triggers deference. The
checking, in the absence of a unified
database, is inconsistent, dependent on
individual HR departments, and easily
skipped when the institution named
sounds prestigious enough to
discourage scrutiny.
The Prestige Premium and Why Foreign
Degrees Are Perfect Vehicles for Fraud
Indonesia has a deeply documented
culture of credential fetishism. As the
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
chairman Sangkot Marzuki stated
bluntly, the fake degree phenomenon
exists because market demand for it
exists. When career advancement, civil
service promotions, and professional
legitimacy are tied so heavily to formal
educational credentials, the market for
fraudulent ones follows naturally.
Foreign degrees amplify this dynamic in
a specific way. They carry a prestige
premium that domestic degrees often
cannot match in perception. A degree
from a recognizable British university,
even one cited inconsistently across
different public profiles, triggers a social
response of assumed legitimacy that is
very difficult to override without
evidence.
This is not unique to Indonesia.
Credential fraud exploiting foreign
university names is documented
globally. But what is specific to
Indonesia is that the verification
infrastructure for catching it is almost
entirely absent.
Compare this to domestic degrees. If
someone falsely claims a degree from
Universitas Indonesia, Universitas
Gadjah Mada, or Institut Teknologi
Bandung, any HR professional with
internet access can check PDDIKTI
within minutes. The fraud is immediately
exposed. The system works exactly as
intended for domestic credentials.
But claim a degree from the University of
Liverpool or the University of London,
and you have entered a verification
vacuum. The burden of proof shifts
entirely to the party trying to disprove
the claim, which is a near-impossible
evidentiary standard in a professional
context.
What the Ministry Must Do: A Concrete
Policy Demand
The solution is not complicated. It
requires political will, administrative
coordination, and the willingness to
demand accountability from every
Indonesian who claims a foreign degree
in a professional, public, or government
capacity.
Here is what Kemendiktisaintek must
implement:
1. Make Penyetaraan Ijazah Luar Negeri
mandatory for anyone exercising
public influence. This should apply to
any Indonesian citizen who holds a
publicly recognized role in a government
institution, state-owned enterprise,
national organization, or publicly funded
body. If you represent yourself as an
expert with a foreign degree in a
capacity that influences other
Indonesians, the state has a legitimate
interest in verifying that credential.
i
. Create a publicly searchable PDDIKTI
extension for verified foreign degree
holders.Every Surat Keputusan
Penyetaraan that has been issued
should be indexed in PDDIKTI alongside
domestic graduates. An employer
should be able to search a name and
university and receive either a confirmed
equivalency record or nothing. That
absence of a record should itself be
prominently flagged.
w
. Establish a time-bound mandatory
registration window for existing
foreign degree holders in public
roles.Anyone currently occupying a
position of public influence who claims a
foreign degree should be required to
complete the equivalency process within
twelve months of policy implementation,
or relinquish the credential claim in their
public representation. This is not
retroactive punishment. It is a simple
administrative requirement: prove what
you claim.
~
Coordinate with Indonesian
diplomatic missions to establish
direct verification channels with
foreign universities. indonesian
embassies in the United Kingdom,
Australia, the United States, the
Netherlands, Germany, Japan, South
Korea, and Malaysia should establish
formal verification liaison protocols with
their countries" higher education quality
bodies. The British university system has
extensive alumni verification
infrastructure. Australia maintains the
TEQSA register. These systems exist.
Indonesia simply needs to build a bridge
to them.
ge
Create legal consequences for
misrepresentation of foreign
credentials in professional and public
contexts. Indonesia already has UU No.
20 Tahun 2003 on the National
Education System and applicable
Criminal Code provisions on document
falsification. What is lacking is specific,
targeted application to foreign credential
misrepresentation, particularly in digital
professional profiles like Linkedin, where
claims are published to audiences of
tens of thousands with zero verification
requirement.
The Circular Irony of Abil Sudarman
Irony on Record
Abil Sudarman gained national
prominence by building tools to detect
fraud in government procurement. He
positioned himself as someone who
exposes systems that operate without
accountability. He named his
procurement dashboard Nemesis Assai,
a reference to the Greek goddess of
retribution against arrogance and
wrongdoing.
And yet, the education credentials he
publicly claimed could not be verified
through any Indonesian government
system. The institution he attended
shifted between sources. His public
biography cited Computer Science at
the University of London. Other media
cited the University of Liverpool. These
are not synonyms. They are different
universities with different locations,
different accreditation structures, and
different records systems.
If a government official had listed
inconsistent degree information across
official sources, the same public
accountability instinct that animated the
Nemesis Assai project would demand
verification. The standard cannot be
applied selectively based on whether
the credential claimant is on the side of
public interest or not.
This is not a personal indictment of Abil
Sudarman. He may hold entirely
legitimate credentials from a legitimate
British institution. But the point is that no
one can verify this through any
Indonesian public system, and that is the
scandal. Not the individual. The absence
of a mechanism that would make the
question answerable at all.
Closing
What Indonesia Loses Without This Reform
Every year, Indonesian employers make
hiring decisions based on foreign degree
claims they cannot verify. Every year,
public figures with unverified foreign
credentials shape discourse, policy, and
professional education markets. Every
year, Indonesian graduates who did the
real work of earning legitimate foreign
degrees and completing the equivalency
process compete in the same
professional market as people who may
have fabricated or exaggerated those
credentials.
The legitimate overseas graduates are,
in a sense, penalized for their
compliance. They went through the
passport documentation, the sworn
translations, the LoA verification, the
PILN portal process. They did everything
right. And they receive no public
verification benefit from having done so,
because no one can see the record.
The Surat Keputusan Penyetaraan sits in
a file. PDDIKTI remains silent. And the
fraud continues.
Indonesia deserves better than this.
The students who studied abroad
legitimately deserve better than this.
The employers who need to make
informed hiring decisions deserve
better than this. And the Indonesian
public, which is increasingly asked to
trust experts, influencers, educators,
and policymakers whose
qualifications cannot be
independently confirmed, absolutely
deserves better than this.
The foreign degree loophole is not a
minor administrative oversight. It is a
structural integrity failure in Indonesia's
credentialing infrastructure, and
Kemendiktisaintek has both the
authority and the obligation to close it.
The question is whether the political will
to do so actually exists.
#HigherEducation #Indonesia
#CredentialFraud #PDDIKTI
#Kemendiktisaintek #ForeignDegree
#PolicyReform #DigitalTransformation
#Accountability
#Education#HRIndonesia
#LinkedInindonesia #AkuntabilitasPublik
#\jazahLuarNegeri #Allndonesia