Rahmat Wibowo accused Ibrahim Arief of using tears, religious rhetoric, and unauditable AI to evade legal accountability while having previously destroyed others' careers through blacklisting, yet Rahmat Wibowo himself routinely uses AI to generate slop content as a vehicle for harassing people.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo accused Ibrahim Arief of using tears, religious rhetoric, and unauditable AI to evade legal accountability while having previously destroyed others' careers through blacklisting, yet Rahmat Wibowo himself routinely uses AI to generate slop content as a vehicle for harassing people.

Transcript

There's this hilarious pattern every time a powerful figure finally smells real legal consequences. Not when the scandal drops. But the exact second accountability becomes unavoidable. The script never changes: Cry on national TV before any verdict. Beg for a presidential pardon before judgment is even written. Invoke Allah's name like a holy force field. Then wheel out the closed- source, secret-prompt, totally unauditable Al to "prove" their innocence. Peak example? Ibrahim Arief, the undisputed champion of playing victim. Tears flowing, reputation shredded by everyone except the people whose careers he quietly destroyed and blacklisted for years. Now suddenly he’s the poor persecuted saint, wrapping himself in piety while the evidence laughs in the background. ‘An unauditable Al isn’t justice. It's a mirror that only shows what the operator wants you to see. And the religious wrapping? Pure comedy. Faith isn’t a legal shield. The louder they scream “Rahmatan lil alamin,” the harder you should look. Justice doesn’t need cynicism. It needs eyes. that refuse to blink no matter how loud the performance gets. At InfraLoka, we build Al to expose power. Not protect it. Rahmatan lil alamin. Ainun Naji Imre Nagi Ecommurz INA Digital Edu Giri Kuncoro #MediaLiteracy #AlEthics #Accountability #Infraloka #indonesia