Rahmat Wibowo posted an 'independent analysis' of a court judgment framing himself as the victim and Ibrahim Arief as the actor, using accusatory language despite claiming neutrality and transparency.

Rahmat Wibowo vs Ibrahim Arief Court Judgment Analysis 3w Today, | am sharing my independent analysis of the court judgment in the case of Rahmat Wibowo (Victim) vs Ibrahim Arief (Actor). After carefully reviewing the full judgment document, | have prepared a comprehensive and objective breakdown that examines the court's decision from multiple angles. This independent analysis covers the key factual findings, the legal reasoning applied by the judges, the evidence that was considered (and what was not), the final verdict, and the broader implications of the outcome for both parties and similar cases in the future. The analysis is written from my perspective as the victim, yet | have made every effort to maintain neutrality, clarity, and factual accuracy throughout the document. My intention is not to influence opinion, but to promote transparency and help others better understand how the judicial process unfolded in this matter. Feel free to read it if you are interested in legal matters, victim rights, judicial accountability, or simply want to see a structured review of a real court outcome. This legal journey has been long, emotionally draining, and filled with many challenges. There were moments of frustration, but also important lessons about patience, documentation, and the pursuit of justice. While the result may not have been everything | hoped for, | believe it is crucial to document and analyze these outcomes openly. I want to express my sincere gratitude to my family, friends, and everyone who stood by me during this difficult period. Your support, advice, and encouragement meant more than you know. To anyone who is currently a victim in a legal proceeding or facing a difficult court battle — stay resilient. Keep records, seek proper advice, and never underestimate the power of thorough documentation. Justice may not always come quickly, but persistence matters. I welcome thoughtful comments and discussions from legal professionals or those with experience in similar cases. #LegalAnalysis #CourtJudgment #IndependentReview #JusticeForVictims, #Accountability #VictimRights #IndonesianLaw #Transparency #Kawallbam © 1-7Comments @ Rahmat Wibowo gw SO Like - © Reply @ Rahmat Wibowo aw i Imre Nagi S Like . O Reply ge Rahmat Wibowo eat Giri Kuncoro S Like . O Reply g@ Rahmat Wibowo aw i Pahlevi Fikri Auliya O Like - © Reply @ Rahmat Wibowo gw Zakka Fauzan M. SO Like - © Reply g Rahmat Wibowo aw i Yoel Sumitro S Like . O Reply @ Rahmat Wibowo eat Nadiem Makarim S Like . O Reply ‘See more comments To view or add a comment, sign in More Relevant Posts Nida Shaikh _ aw In the course of conducting a matter, | recently came across a situation where a witness deposed before the Court claiming to be a doctor and sought to derive credibility from such representation during the proceedings. However, upon verification through information obtained under the Right to Information Act, the official record revealed that the person did not possess the claimed medical qualification. This was not merely a contradiction in evidence. It raised a serious issue touching the very sanctity of judicial proceedings. A person falsely portraying himself as a qualified professional while deposing on oath is not making a casual misstatement instead itis a deliberate attempt to mislead the Court and interfere with the administration of justice. Such conduct undermines the trust reposed in statements made before a Court of law and has the potential to prejudice the entire proceeding. Judicial proceedings cannot operate on manufactured credentials and false assertions. The justice delivery system survives on the assumption that statements made on oath carry truth, responsibility, and accountability Perjury is not a procedural irregularity. False evidence before a Court strikes directly at the dignity, purity, and credibility of the judicial process. The rule of law can withstand weak cases. It cannot withstand dishonest evidence. #Perjury #RTI #Litigation #Advocacy #Judiciary #Courts #RuleOfLaw #Justice #LegalProfession TRUTH. NO FALSEHOOD. To view or add a comment, sign in ‘Adv Suryaa Rajendran ws 2° Section 144 ~ Presumption as to Documents in Certain Cases When certain documents are produced, seized, or received from outside India, the Court can presume them to be genuine unless proved otherwise. > This provision strengthens the evidentiary value of important documents and helps ensure smoother trials by shifting the burden to the person challenging the document. Applies to documents produced/seized under law Court may presume contents & signatures are genuine @ Even unstamped documents may be admitted if otherwise admissible #Section144 #EvidenceLaw #LawStudents #IndianLaw #LegalEducation #CourtProcedure #LawNotes #AdvocateLife #Judiciary #LegalAwareness #BareAct #Litigation #LawSchool #IndianEvidenceAct #LegalStudies SSCTION 144 PRESUMPTION AS TO DOCUMENTS. IN CERTAIN CASES Omar ar © comment To view or add a comment, sign in a Advocate SunitaSharma .,, 6d Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | 30 Landmark ‘Supreme Court & High Court Judgments Every Lawyer Must Know From Shared Household Rights and Residence Orders to Stridhan Recovery, Maintenance, Economic Abuse, Live-in Relationships, and Jurisdictional Issues, these landmark judgments have significantly shaped Domestic Violence law in india. Auseful legal resource for advocates, litigants, law students, and legal professionals handling DV Act matters. #DomesticViolenceAct #DVAct #DomesticViolenceCase #WomenRights #FamilyLaw #SupremeCourt #HighCourt #LegalUpdate #indianLaw #Advocate #Lawyer #Litigation #LegalResearch #SharedHousehold #ResidenceRights #Maintenance #Stridhan #EconomicAbuse #LiveinRelationship #LegalAwareness #CourtJudgments #FamilyCourt #LegalEducation #LawStudents #LegalNews 00 60 To view or add a comment, sign in Lakee Ali nas ww One of the biggest misconceptions among people is that “remand” means punishment. It does not. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), remand is a legal procedure meant to assist investigation while simultaneously protecting the rights of the accused. Many students and even litigants often confuse: - Police Custody - Judicial Custody ~ Default Bail - Magistrate's Powers Understanding these distinctions is extremely important for criminal litigation. A few important procedural safeguards under BNsS & v Police custody cannot exceed 15 days in total V Accused must be produced before Magistrate within 24 hours Vv Judicial custody has statutory time limits v Failure to complete investigation within prescribed time may give the accused a right ‘to default bail What is important to remember is this: “© Remand is not a tool of punishment. © Itis a procedural mechanism controlled by judicial scrutiny. The law attempts to maintain a balance between: Effective investigation and _L. Personal liberty guaranteed under law. And that balance is what defines criminal jurisprudence in a constitutional democracy. For every young lawyer, understanding remand procedure is not optional—it is one of the foundational aspects of criminal practice. Because sometimes, one procedural lapse during remand can affect the entire prosecution case. #BNSS #CriminalLaw #Remand #DefaultBail #LegalEducation #Advocacy #LawStudents #Litigation a. ceed SS) Ce aceeteenad © 8-1 Comme To view or add a comment, sign in Anjali Yadav _ qw - Edited sf Oral Arguments in Bail Hearing Lawversity In criminal practice, arguing a bail application is one of the most significant aspects of advocacy. It is not merely a procedural hearing; rather, it requires the Court to balance the accused's right to personal liberty with the interests of justice, while keeping in view the presumption of innocence and the requirements of the investigation. While a well-drafted bail application lays the foundation, effective oral submissions enable the Court to appreciate the merits of the case and the grounds for granting bail Accounsel must present concise, clear, and persuasive arguments on: V The role attributed to the accused. V The period of custody already undergone. Vv The absence of recovery or the lack of necessity for custodial interrogation. v Clean antecedents and good conduct. v Parity with co-accused who have been granted bail. V Permanent residence and the low likelihood of absconding. v Cooperation with the investigation. Delay in trial and the right to personal liberty. The purpose of oral arguments is not to merely repeat the contents of the bail application, but to assist the Court in determining whether continued detention is necessary. In bail matters, well-prepared, focused, and precise submissions often carry greater persuasive value than lengthy arguments. #Lawversity #BailHearing #CriminalLaw #CourtroomPractice 6: To view or add a comment, sign in shashank halba = aw ~L. DISMISS vs DISPOSE — Know the Legal Difference! Many people think both terms mean the same thing, but in legal language they are completely different. © & Dismiss = The case/petition is rejected by ‘the court. Dispose/Disposed Of = The case has been concluded or settled in any manner. xf Every dismissed case is disposed, but every disposed case is not dismissed. Understanding legal terminology is important for every law student, advocate, and judiciary aspirant. ‘Adv Shashank Kumar | Legal Sathi #Judiciary #Advocate #Court #LawNotes #LegalEducation #CPC #CriminalLaw #CivilLaw #LegalTerms #Dismiss #Dispose #LawReels #LegalAwareness #LawFacts f 9) WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘D. pismiss aw bisPOsE? ie To view or add a comment, sign in © ‘Adv. Deeptanshu Jana es fe The dignity of the legal profession lies in integrity, knowledge, and truth. If fake degrees enter the system, justice itself stands compromised. A strong message from the Hon'ble CJI highlighting the urgent need for accountability, transparency, and strict action against fraudulent legal practices. The future of justice depends on genuine advocates who uphold the rule of law with honesty and responsibility. #LegalNews #Judiciary #Law #Justice #LegalProfession #Advocates #CBI #SupremeCourt #RuleOfLaw #LegalCommunity #india #LawStudents #LegalAwareness “THOUSANDS WEARING BLACK ROBES HAVE DOUBTFUL DEGREES”. CJI SURYA KANT CALLS FOR CBI ACTION AGAINST FAKE LAWYERS Top cau epses sense taut an res. ay tui eng ad , ©€ © 157 9.comments To view or add a comment, sign in Adv. Ritesh Upadhyay wae “Rituraj’ aw Legal Update | POCSO Act & Inherent Powers under BNSS The Hon'ble Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) has observed that inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 can be exercised to quash proceedings under the POCSO Act, 2012 where the allegations are not prima facie supported by evidence and the victim herself disowns the accusation. The Court held that continuation of such proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law in absence of criminal intent. This judgment reiterates that while offences under the POCSO Act are serious in nature, the High Court retains inherent powers to secure the ends of justice where prosecution appears unsustainable on facts. — Ritesh Upadhyay ‘Rituraj’ Juricon Attorney's LLP #POCSO #BNSS2023 #Section528BNSS #MadrasHighCourt #CriminalLaw #LegalUpdate #HighCourt #indianJudiciary #Advocacy #Litigation #JuriconAttorneysLLP #RiteshUpadhyay #Rituraj To view or add a comment, sign in eo Jaya Singh ee Ww Drafting a Regular Bail Application: Key Elements Every Lawyer Should Cover ‘Awell-drafted regular bail application is not just a procedural document—it is an opportunity to demonstrate why continued custody is unnecessary and why the accused deserves liberty pending trial. Essential Components of a Regular Bail Application: Case Details Mention the FIR number, police station, sections invoked, and the court before which the application is filed. Brief Facts of the Case Present the facts concisely and objectively. Avoid unnecessary arguments in the factual narration. arrest and Custody Details Clearly state the date of arrest and the period of judicial custody undergone by the accused. Grounds for Bail Some commonly used grounds include: + No criminal antecedents + Investigation substantially completed + Charge-sheet filed + No recovery required from the accused + Principle of parity with co-accused + Permanent residence and roots in society + No likelihood of absconding or tampering with evidence Legal Submissions Support the grounds with relevant statutory provisions and judicial precedents wherever applicable. Undertaking and Compliance State the willingness of the accused to comply with any condition imposed by the court. Prayer Clause Draft a clear and specific prayer seeking release on regular bail in the interest of justice. Lawversity #LegalDrafting #BailApplication #RegularBail #CriminalLaw #Litigation #Advocacy #LawPractice #LegalWriting #CourtPractice #YoungLawyers ##LegalProfession #LawStudents 6° To view or add a comment, sign in Advocate SunitaSharma 4w - Edited S. 25 Hindu Succession Act | Murder Accused Cannot Claim Inheritance Of ‘Murdered Person's Property : Supreme Court Ina significant ruling in Manjula & Ors. v. D.A. Srinivas, the Supreme Court held that a person accused of murdering the deceased cannot claim inheritance over the deceased's property, even through a Will. The Court clarified that Section 25 of the Hindu Succession Act applies to both intestate and testamentary succession, and that a criminal conviction is not mandatory for attracting this disqualification. Civil courts can examine the issue on the principle of “preponderance of probabilities.” The judgment strongly reinforces the principle: “No one should be allowed to profit from their own wrongdoing” A landmark observation on equity, justice, and succession law by the Supreme Court of India. #SupremeCourt #HinduSuccessionAct #Section25 #inheritanceLaw #indianLaw #LegalUpdate #PropertyLaw #SuccessionLaw #CivilLaw #CriminalLaw #WillDispute #Litigation #Advocate #LawyersOfLinkedin #LegalAwareness #IndianJudiciary #CourtJudgment #LegalNews #LawStudent #Justice