Rahmat Wibowo published a detailed investigation accussing that Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman falsely represents his role as a KORIKA Executive Director when he actually holds a coordinative PMO position at UNESCO, cannot verify his University of London and Binus University degrees, and has made unsubstantiated claims about receiving an "AI Innovator of the Year" award without credible documentation.

Original post ↗

Rahmat Wibowo published a detailed investigation accussing that Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman falsely represents his role as a KORIKA Executive Director when he actually holds a coordinative PMO position at UNESCO, cannot verify his University of London and Binus University degrees, and has made unsubstantiated claims about receiving an "AI Innovator of the Year" award without credible documentation.

Transcript

DETAILED INVESTIGATION: Abil S.'s Case study This announcement is backed by a thorough investigation revealing multiple discrepancies: 1. PROFESSIONAL ROLE MISREPRESENTATION Claim: KORIKA Executive Director Actual Status: PMO (Project Management Office) for UNESCO Critical distinction: Executive Director = Leadership & Decision Making Authority PMO (Project Management Office! Administrative Support & Process Management Not equivalent to Project Manager or Consultant roles He holds a coordinative support position for UNESCO, similar to other PMO staff members. Other legitimate experts don't heavily bandwagon or oversell their involvement—they operate with transparency about actual scope. Action: Verify directly with UNESCO about his exact role and responsibilities. 2. EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIAL FRAUD CONCERNS Claim: Degrees from University of London and Binus University Finding: Unable to verify academic credentials through official channels His CV repeatedly emphasizes "University of London" qualifications, but: No confirmed academic records from University of London No verified graduation records from BINUS ONLINE Unclear if claims are about formal degrees, online courses, or certifications None are verifiable through official institutional records 3. UNSUBSTANTIATED AWARD CLAIMS. Claim: "Al Innovator of the Year" Finding: Zero credible verification This award appears on his profiles but investigation reveals: Missing Documentation: €.No records from recognized global awards (MIT Tech Review, Forbes, IEEE) <No credible Indonesian national awards (Government Awards, Ministry of Technology) Zero reputable media coverage >€ No official press release or announcement No third-party validation Red Flags: Self-claimed without external verification Likely from non-recognized or informal event Misleading framing as established credential Critical Questions: Who specifically awarded this? Name the organization. In which year? Where is official documentation? Why no credible media coverage? WHY THIS MATTERS FOR INDONESIA Misleading credentials damage: @ Business partnerships built on false expertise @ Policy recommendations from unqualified advisors Trust in professional communities @ Economic decisions based on inflated qualifications @ Opportunities for legitimate experts who maintain integrity Indonesia's professional ecosystem is stronger when we demand transparency. #KawalKepakaran #DueDiligence #CredentialVerification #Professionalintegrity #Transparency #FactCheck #Protectindonesia #Leadership #AntiMisleadinginfluencers