Rahmat Wibowo's legal notice to lawyer Rama Abdurachman demanding Rp533 million, a 30-day public apology and the deletion of a month-old Threads reply that called his “somasi as a service” the work of someone “mentally disabled”

Download the collected pages (PDF) ↓

Document pages

Found in: Threads ↗

Page not found yet: 13

Open the PDF in a new tab ↗

Analysis

What this document is

A Surat Somasi (legal notice), “Surat Peringatan Hukum”, no. 093/SOMASI/RW/XI/2026, dated Tuesday, 10 November 2026, from Rahmat Wibowo of Bekasi, “acting for myself as the injured party”, “without counsel”, to Rama Abdurachman, owner of the Threads account @ramaabdr and founder of the legal services firm Master Legal Solution. It lists Rama’s business email and three office addresses published by his firm, and is copied only to “Arsip” (file). It is typed without a letterhead and runs to 18 pages, the last five of them an evidence annex. Seventeen pages were shown; page 13 (the rest of the consequences and the closing) was not.

He posted it on Threads on 10 November 2026 at about 04:14 WIB, asking Meta AI to rate it “above average” (ev-20261110-001). His screenshots of the reply and of a Google search are timed 03:33 and 03:34 WIB that night.

What it says

I. The conduct complained of.

  • The post. On 12 October 2026, Fuadit Muhammad (@fuaditrockz) posted a thread about a new term, “Somasi as a service & Professional Troublemaker”, describing someone “whose job is reporting anything, from ITB, AWS, Ferry Irwandi, Raymond Chin, to the police”. Under it, @ramaabdr replied: “Orang cacat mental gaya gayaan somasi somasi, ambil medications anjer” (a mentally disabled person showing off with somasi after somasi, take your medications, damn); “Iq tinggi, EQ dungu gitu jadi nya, kebanyakan hidup di dunia pokemon” (high IQ, stupid EQ, that’s what you get, living too much in a Pokémon world); “Iq tinggi tapi losers in life, ya itu lah yang bikin somasi as services”; “Lawfirm bukan, notaris bukan, Pendidikan PKPA tidak” (not a law firm, not a notary, no advocate training); “Pas lapor polisi, ditanya sama penyidik diketawain disuruh pulang” (when he reported to the police, the investigator laughed at him and sent him home); and “Karena lapor polisi ternyata perlu social skill yang RW tidak ada intelektual nya”. The reply had 7 likes and 1 share.
  • He does not dispute criticism of somasi practice, nor the line “not a law firm, not a notary, no PKPA”: “it is indeed true that I act for myself as the injured party”. He objects to the insults, the references to his health and the claim about his police reports.
  • Identification. The reply does not name him, but “RW” are his initials, and a Google search for “penggagas somasi as a service” (originator of somasi as a service) on 10 November at 03:34 returned an AI overview naming “Rahmat Wibowo, Co-Founder and CEO of InfraLoka” (B-3).
  • Rama’s identity. From his Threads profile (“Business Lawyer & Consultant”, 322 followers), his LinkedIn profile (founder of Master Legal Solution, Universitas Indonesia law graduate, 2013–2017), and a PERADI advocate-training (PKPA) certificate of 27 October 2025 in the name “Abdurachman Ramadhan, S.H.”, which Rahmat “assumes” is Rama’s “because of the similarity of name, degree and education” (B-4 to B-7).
  • His police reports. Against “laughed at and sent home”, he says his reports were accepted and registered, “thirteen police reports” at Polda Metro Jaya and its units.
  • Harm. A false public impression that his reports are not taken seriously, damage to his reputation, psychological pressure from the words “cacat mental” and “ambil medications”, a possible worsening of his health, and less confidence in speaking out and using the law.

II. Legal basis. The new Criminal Code (Law 1/2023), in force since 2 January 2026, rather than the ITE Law: written defamation (Article 433(2)), minor insult (Article 436) and slander (Article 434, as the “main” charge, with 433(2) “subsidiary”), each increased by one third under Article 441(1) for use of information technology, with element-by-element tables marked “Yes”. Complaint offence and time limit (Articles 440 and 29). The civil code (Articles 1365, 1372, 1374, and others). An analysis of intent (Article 36). A table of eleven “excuses” Rama might give, with rebuttals. A conditional note that, if Rama is an advocate, the advocates’ code of ethics requires courtesy. And Articles 5, 26, 143 and 145 of the Disability Law (Law 8/2016): he states he is “a survivor of mental disability diagnosed with bipolar disorder” and cites an Eka Hospital certificate of 13 May 2026 and RSKD Duren Sawit certificates of 9 September and 8 October 2026, “four days before your post” (B-8 to B-10).

The Rp533 million. He takes the highest maximum fine among the articles he cites, Rp266,666,666.67 for slander under Articles 434 and 441(1), and doubles it: “2 × Rp266,666,666.67 = Rp533,333,333.34”.

III. Demands. Confirm receipt by email within three calendar days (by Friday, 13 November 2026, 17:00 WIB), and within seven calendar days (by Tuesday, 17 November 2026, 17:00 WIB):

  1. delete the reply and any similar post;
  2. publish a public apology on @ramaabdr, kept up for at least 30 days, withdrawing “cacat mental”, “ambil medications” and “diketawain disuruh pulang” and expressing sincere regret;
  3. stop all statements about his health, disability or intelligence;
  4. pay Rp533,333,333.34 in immaterial damages to an account he will give by email;
  5. confirm all of this in writing, and correct his identification of Rama if it is wrong.

IV. Settlement. An offer to settle by email by the same deadline.

V. Consequences. “Without further notice”: a criminal complaint under Articles 434 (subsidiary 433(2)), 436 and 441(1) of the Criminal Code and Articles 145 and 143 of the Disability Law; a civil suit for at least Rp533,333,333.34, a public apology and publication of the judgment; and an ethics complaint to an advocates’ honour council if Rama is an advocate. The rest of the list is on the missing page 13.

VII. Evidence. B-1, Fuadit’s thread with Rama’s reply; B-2, the reply alone; B-3, the Google AI overview; B-4 to B-7, Rama’s Threads and LinkedIn profiles, his education history and the PKPA certificate; B-8 to B-10, Rahmat’s medical certificates (page 18): the Eka Hospital certificate of 13 May 2026, which declares him “fit to work”, and the RSKD Duren Sawit certificates of 9 September and 8 October 2026 for his next outpatient visits, with his medical record number and date of birth blacked out.

Observations

  1. The Rp533 million formula, again. Rp533,333,333 is the amount he has demanded in his legal notices to Yassirullah Muhammad, Adith Widya Pradipta, Julyana Sonia Darmawati, Ghozy Ul Haq, Adityo Pratomo, Gatot Gunarso and Kukuh Setiawan, among others (doc-20260828-001, doc-20260920-001, doc-20261001-001), for a reply with seven likes.
  2. A month later, before dawn. The reply was posted on 12 October. He took his screenshots on 10 November at 03:33 and 03:34 WIB and posted the finished 18-page notice at about 04:14.
  3. The thread followed his own attacks. Fuadit’s thread came a day after Rahmat had spammed “where is the plus62.ai you promised??” under at least seven posts and called Fuadit a “NATO” influencer (ev-20261011-002, ev-20261011-003). He sent the notice not to the author of the thread but to a replier.
  4. “Not a law firm, not a notary, no PKPA”: true. He concedes the one line about his qualifications, while threatening a law graduate, whom he believes to hold an advocate-training certificate, with prison under four articles and an ethics complaint.
  5. His own search engine optimisation as proof. To show that “somasi as a service” points to him, he cites a Google AI overview that calls him its “originator” and cites InfraLoka’s own pages, the phrase he has promoted himself.
  6. Identity by name similarity. He “assumes” a PERADI certificate for “Abdurachman Ramadhan” belongs to “Rama Abdurachman”, and publishes it, with Rama’s university grade point average and his firm’s office addresses, in a letter he posted on Threads.
  7. Thirteen reports as the answer. Against the claim that police laughed at him, he cites thirteen registered police reports. His own request letter of the same date lists five of those thirteen as having received neither a progress letter nor an invitation, and 35 of his 36 complaint letters as having got no further than a receipt (doc-20261110-001).
  8. His medical file, attached by himself. He demands that Rama stop all statements about his health, and attaches his own psychiatric certificates (doc-20260513-001, doc-20260909-001, doc-20261008-001) to a notice he publishes, describing his diagnosis in detail.

Legal references are quoted as he states them and have not been checked against the official texts.

Pages still needed

Page 13 (the rest of section V and any closing section).