Rahmat Wibowo's request to the Jakarta police chief for progress updates on his 13 police reports and 36 complaint letters, listing the people he has reported

What this document is

A Surat Permohonan (request letter), no. 091/PERMOHONAN/RW/XI/2026, dated Tuesday, 10 November 2026, from Rahmat Wibowo “as complainant” (Pelapor dan Pengadu) to the chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police (Polda Metro Jaya). It is typed without a letterhead and signed “(ditandatangani pada surat asli)” (signed on the original), “Bekasi, 10 November 2026”. It has two annexes: a list of his police reports (Annex I) and a list of his complaint letters (Annex II). He posted it on Threads on 9 November 2026 at about 18:07 WIB. All ten pages have been found.

Copies (tembusan) go to:

1. the head of Bareskrim (the national police criminal investigation agency);
2. the director of cyber crime at Bareskrim (Dittipidsiber);
3. the head of the Bareskrim investigation oversight bureau (Karowassidik);
4. the director of cyber crime at Polda Metro Jaya;
5. the director of general crime at Polda Metro Jaya;
6. the head of Propam (professional standards) at Polda Metro Jaya;
7. the chiefs of the South Jakarta, South Tangerang, Bekasi City and Central Jakarta police, “for the police reports in each unit”.

What it says

I. Background.

1. From 27 April to 27 September 2026 he filed 13 police reports at the integrated police service centres (SPKT) of Polda Metro Jaya and the South Jakarta, South Tangerang, Bekasi City and Central Jakarta police. For some of them he received a progress letter (SP2HP) or an invitation to a clarification.
2. He also sent complaint letters to the head of Bareskrim, Bareskrim’s cyber crime directorate and the Jakarta police chief. The cyber crime directorate passed some of them on to Polda Metro Jaya’s cyber crime directorate with letter B/1629/IX/RES.7.4./2026/Dittipidsiber of 22 September 2026.
3. Because they are spread over several units, he does not know the status of each. He holds receipts for all the complaint letters.
4. For five police reports he has received neither an SP2HP nor an invitation: LP/B/3004/IV/2026 (27 April 2026), LP/B/2231/VII/2026 (17 July 2026), LP/B/2140/VII/2026 (21 July 2026), LP/B/3473/IX/2026 (1 September 2026) and LP/B/7205/IX/2026 (27 September 2026).

II. Basis. Article 144(f) of Law 20/2025, the new Criminal Procedure Code, which he says gives a victim the right to information on the progress of a case.

III. Requests.

1. A written SP2HP for every police report in Annex I, stating its status (inquiry or investigation), the steps taken and planned, the name, unit and official contact of the officer in charge, and the number and date of the inquiry or investigation order.
2. A first SP2HP as soon as possible for the reports for which he has none.
3. For every complaint letter in Annex II, the unit handling it, its agenda or registration number, and the result: passed on, upgraded to a police report, or not followed up, with reasons.
4. Because the reports and complaints are related and spread over several units, coordination between units and, if appropriate, merging them or appointing one coordinating unit, and information about planned case reviews (gelar perkara).
5. Replies in writing or by email.

IV. Closing. He is ready to provide further data and evidence and to attend if needed. “All parties named in the annexes are suspected parties and subject to the presumption of innocence.”

Annex I. Police reports. “The report number, date, articles and reported party are quoted from the report receipt (Surat Tanda Penerimaan Laporan). The last column contains the latest letter I have received from the police unit.”

Annex II. Complaint letters. The letter notes that the numbers are his own file numbers and that the “parties complained about” column lists only some of the parties. In his “status according to my file” column, every complaint reads “I hold a receipt”, sometimes with a request to know whether it was among those passed on to Polda Metro Jaya. The one exception is no. 11.

A. To the Jakarta police chief, directly or as an alternative

B. To Bareskrim’s cyber crime directorate on 12 and 13 August 2026 (“ten letters; seven of them numbered 002 to 008”; only those seven are listed)

C. To Bareskrim’s cyber crime directorate on 5, 28 and 29 September 2026

Observations

1. Forty-nine filings in under six months. By his own count he filed 13 police reports between 27 April and 27 September 2026 and sent 36 complaint letters between 13 August and 14 October 2026, to five police units, Bareskrim and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). This letter asks the police to coordinate them all and to consider merging them.
2. Receipts, not results. In his own status column, 35 of the 36 complaints have got no further than a receipt. The only one taken up is his complaint against Ferry Irwandi, which was handled by Polda Metro Jaya’s general crime directorate (doc-20260911-001). Of the 13 police reports, five have had neither a progress letter nor an invitation.
3. The report behind the 11 September invitation. The South Jakarta police letter about report LP/B/2914/VII/2026 did not name the reported party (doc-20260814-002). Here he names him: Rahmat Fabhian Aminuddin, an AWS solutions architect and his ITB classmate, whom he also named, with AWS Indonesia, in complaint 006/ADUAN/RW/08/2026.
4. The report behind the 14 October invitation. Report LP/B/3472/IX/2026, for which he was invited to a clarification on 14 October (doc-20260930-002), is against the owner of the X account @ezash, the handle of Eza Hazami, whom he has called a “future convict” (ev-20261014-001).
5. An inquiry he cited, a progress letter he says he never got. On 30 October he told the employer of Petra Novandi Barus that report LP/B/2231/VII/2026 was under inquiry, citing an inquiry order, SP.Lidik/2535/VII/RES.1.14./2026 (doc-20261030-001). Here he lists the same report among the five for which he has received neither a progress letter nor an invitation.
6. Some complaints left out. The list does not include complaints held in this archive: 077/ADUAN-DITTIPIDSIBER/RW/IX/2026 against Meta AI (doc-20260928-001), whose number falls in the middle of the 28 September series, and 087/ADUAN/RW/X/2026 to Propam against the Bekasi Utara investigators handling Machrio Achmad Nurhatta’s report against him (doc-20261014-001). Section B says ten letters were sent on 12 and 13 August but lists seven.
7. The same people, again and again. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta is named in four complaints (nos. 2, 14, 15 and 20) and Abigail Aryaputra Sudarman in four (7, 10, 12 and 19). Luca Cada Lora (12, 17, 24) and Maria Khelli (18, 32, 35) are named in three each. Rahmat Fabhian Aminuddin, Petra Novandi Barus, Ferry Irwandi, Marcello Faria, AWS Indonesia and Dinda Rhapsodya’s side are each named at least twice.
8. “Presumption of innocence”, posted to the public. The letter says that everyone named in the annexes is only a suspected party, entitled to the presumption of innocence. He then published the full list of names on Threads.
9. No letter on the report against Steven. His earliest report, LP/B/3004/IV/2026 of 27 April 2026 against Steven Nataniel Kodyat, is the only one on the list against Steven, and by his own account he has received nothing on it: no progress letter and no invitation. Yet on 2 November he claimed on Threads that Steven had been “summoned by the police, absent three times, on the way to becoming a suspect” (ev-20261102-008).
10. Luca’s “summons”. On 9 November he announced that Luca Cada Lora “will be summoned” as the reported party under report LP/B/2839/VII/2026 (ev-20261109-004). His own list gives the latest letter on that report as his own invitation to a clarification on 10 August.
11. The report about this archive. Report LP/B/5273/VII/2026 of 20 July 2026, which he described to Komdigi as his report about the website rahmatwibowo.com (ev-20260728-032), is listed with the reported party “under inquiry (name not written)” and one progress letter, of 28 July 2026.
12. Machrio, six times. With two police reports (nos. 5 and 6) on top of four complaints, Machrio Achmad Nurhatta is named in six of the 49 filings. Dinda Rhapsodya’s report (no. 2) is dated 14 July 2026, the day the manpower mediator issued the recommendation in his dispute with her company (doc-20260714-001).
13. Posted before its own date. The letter is dated and signed “Bekasi, 10 November 2026”. He posted it on the evening of 9 November.

The legal basis he cites (Article 144(f) of Law 20/2025) is quoted as he states it and has not been checked against the official text.