Rahmat Wibowo's complaint to the Jakarta police chief against AWS Indonesia, Anthony Amni, Donald Tirtaatmadja and Dian Hamama over his 2023 probation dismissal

What this document is

A 19-page Surat Aduan Masyarakat (public complaint), numbered 007/ADUAN/RW/09/2026 and dated 8 September 2026, from Rahmat Wibowo as the “Pengadu” (complainant) to the Chief of the Jakarta Regional Police (Polda Metro Jaya). It is directed at four “Teradu” (respondents):

• Teradu I: PT Amazon Web Services Indonesia, his former employer.
• Teradu II: Anthony Amni, its President Director.
• Teradu III: Donald Tirtaatmadja, who signed the company’s power of attorney to its lawyers, Makarim & Taira S., as “Direktur / Director”.
• Teradu IV: Dian Hamama, of the company’s Human Resources team.

Pages 1–8 have been found. Pages 9–19 have not.

What it says

• The dismissal. He joined PT AWS Indonesia on 7 August 2023 in the “AWS Next Gen Program – Solutions Architect”. On 14 September 2023, during his probation, the company ended his employment through Dian Hamama, effective 22 September 2023. He says he never received the 2022–2024 company regulations.
• The mediation. A bipartite meeting on 27 July 2026 and two mediation sessions on 6 and 13 August 2026 at the South Jakarta manpower office (Sudinaker) ended with a mediator’s recommendation (Anjuran) that he calls harmful to him.
• Eleven counts (the table on pages 7–8):
  1. False statements with legal consequences (Article 373(1) of the new Criminal Code, up to seven years in prison; corporate fine up to Rp5 billion). The basis is the company’s written statement in mediation that it was never told of any psychological problem he had. He says he told HR in writing.
  2. Written defamation (Article 433(2)).
  3. Slander (Article 434).
  4. Aggravation for using information technology (Article 441(1), adding a third to counts 2 and 3).
  5. Defamation under the ITE Law (Article 27A with Article 45(4) of Law 1/2024). Counts 2 to 5 are all aimed at forum accounts whose names include “Amazon” (“Amazon ndarboyGenk”, “Amazon mkUldh”) posting in a forum called “f/KawalRahmatWibowo”.
  6. Expressing hatred on the basis of religion (Article 300(b)).
  7. Spreading religious hatred through information technology (Article 301(1), up to five years). Counts 6 and 7 rest on one reply from an account named “Amazon AWSome” on 25 September 2023. It quoted his own lines (“Saya dapat mencicil rumah disurga”, “I can pay off a house in heaven in instalments”, and “Jadi ladang dosa orang lain”, “Becoming a field of sin for others”) and answered: “We don’t need ayat-ayat from someone like you.”
  8. Obstructing the rights of a person with a disability (Articles 143 and 145 of Law 8/2016), against Dian Hamama and “the mediating parties”.
  9. Not handing over the company regulations (Articles 114 and 188 of Law 13/2003). This is a minor offence carrying only a Rp5–50 million fine.
  10. Corporate criminal liability (Articles 45–49 and 121 of the new Criminal Code) for counts 1–9 and 11, with Anthony Amni as the officer holding “the highest functional position”.
  11. Threats of open violence with combined force (Article 449(1)(a), up to three years). This concerns AWS Cloud Day 2023, where, as AWS’s lawyers put it in a letter of 14 July 2026, “our client’s team took back your event access badge and escorted you out of the event venue”.
• Pre-empting the defence. For each count he lists the respondents’ likely defence and his rebuttal (“Sanggahan Hukum”). He also flags a correction to his own work: he had first cited Article 146 of Law 8/2016, which turned out to be a transitional provision about disability cards, so he switched to Article 145.

Observations

1. A five-week probation, three years later. He was let go on 14 September 2023, five weeks after starting. The complaint was written in September 2026, after the mediation ended in a recommendation he did not like. It turns that dismissal into eleven criminal counts, two of them carrying prison terms of up to five and seven years, against the company, its president director, a director and an individual HR staff member.
2. The company’s own account of why he was let go. In the same mediation statement he relies on (Exhibit B-001), AWS stated that during his 2023 probation he “was given verbal warnings many times” (“berkali-kali diberikan teguran lisan”) and was accused of several violations. The complaint calls this a “coercive” working relationship. It quotes the company’s admission and then reads it as evidence against the company.
3. “Violence” means being walked out of an event. The only act described under Article 449 is security staff, on the company’s instructions, taking back his access badge and escorting him out of AWS Cloud Day 2023. He anticipates the defence that he was removed “because the reporter disturbed order” and does not deny it. His rebuttal is that being escorted out in public led to mockery on social media, including someone asking whether he bought “happy meals” at McDonald’s.
4. Anonymous posts, blamed on AWS and its president director. AWS’s lawyers denied in writing any link to the accounts labelled “Amazon” (Exhibit C-003). The pages found offer no evidence connecting the accounts to the company beyond that word in their names. He still asks police to hold the corporation and Anthony Amni personally liable for “letting” those posts continue since 2023.
5. “Religious hatred” is a reply to his own sermon. The post he calls hatred against a religion is a rebuke of him personally, “someone like you”, for quoting religious verses in an argument about his dismissal. It is dated 25 September 2023, the same day his own forum account threatened to take everyone discussing him to the police for defamation (ev-20261022-005).
6. The disability claim. He says he told HR about his psychological condition in writing. He also anticipates the defence that his condition was not medically documented as a disability when he was let go in 2023, and he does not dispute that. His rebuttal is that the duty to protect him was a “continuous omission”. The complaint follows his pattern of hiding behind his ADHD and bipolar diagnoses whenever an employer acts on his conduct (see, for example, ev-20260603-005, where he accused another former employer of failing diversity and inclusion).
7. Individuals named for doing their jobs. Dian Hamama is accused of a false-statement offence carrying up to seven years for the company’s position in a labour mediation. Donald Tirtaatmadja is accused of the same for signing a power of attorney to the company’s lawyers. The complaint repeats that he is also “suspected” of falsely holding his title as director, citing an earlier complaint, 006/ADUAN/RW/08/2026.
8. Not shown to have been filed. The identity table on page 1 gives only his name and his job, “Profesional / CEO Infraloka”. The pages found show no police receipt or report number.

Legal references were checked against published summaries, not official texts.

Pages still needed

Pages 9–19.