Rahmat Wibowo's 'official warning' of 19 July 2026 to lawyer R. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta, demanding within three days that he withdraw all his police reports, promise never to report him again and apologise publicly, and threatening to report his employees

What this document is

A letter headed “TEGURAN RESMI Kepada Saudara R. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta” (official warning to R. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta), dated 19 July 2026 and signed “Rahmat Wibowo”, without letterhead or number, followed by an annex of “evidence” for each demand with numbered pages. It was published in Rahmat’s YouTube video “Teguran Resmi Kepada R. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta Pemilik Machi Achmad & Partners”, where he scrolls through it beside his “Somasi as a Service” page; the pages here are stitched from its 5-second frames. Page 1 is complete and page 2 runs to the signature. Of the annex, the upper parts of pages 3, 4, 6 and 8 and the lower part of page 7 are missing (grey), page 5 scrolled past between frames, and the video ends on page 8.

What it says

• No third somasi. A first somasi was sent on 12 May 2026 and a “second and last” on 13 July with a deadline of 16 July; both went “without a written reply and without adequate compliance”. “I will not send a third somasi. This is my last official warning to you, delivered openly.”
• Who started it. “The dispute did not originate from my mistake”, but because Machrio was “unprofessional as the lawyer for my former employer” and, instead of defending his client in line with the advocates’ code, “intimidated and demeaned me personally”; “according to information I have received”, his client has ended its professional relationship with him.
• Seven demands.
  1. Withdraw all reports he made or encouraged against Rahmat, including reports naming the legal subject “Machi Achmad”.
  2. Promise in writing not to report him again personally.
  3. Apologise publicly for all acts and statements that demeaned his honour and dignity.
  4. Clarify publicly that the dispute began because Machrio was unprofessional, and say whether he is still the lawyer or was dismissed by the client “because of your conduct which, according to my reading, has also led you to block me”.
  5. Clarify publicly whether his real name is “Machi Achmad” or “R. Machrio Achmad Nurhatta”; police reports under “Machi Achmad” “must be corrected”, as HAKI records show it is the name of a law firm.
  6. Come to Rahmat’s place to discuss all the alleged wrongs, with a written analysis of how every element of the reported offences is met.
  7. Admit in writing all wrongdoing and violations of law “in the file laporan-bukti-machrio.md”.
• Deadline and threat. Wednesday, 22 July 2026, 12.00 WIB. “If by that deadline you do not fulfil the demands above, I will take maximum legal action without further warning. I will report you, and I will report your employees, in accordance with the law.” “This is your last chance to settle this amicably.”
• The annex (pages found). For demand 1: a report under Article 449 of the new Criminal Code (threats of violence) “is unfounded”; reports naming “Machi Achmad” are “void”, citing the fraud article (Article 492) on false names; and a “pattern of three consecutive reports”, citing an Instagram Story calling him “Calon TSK dan Terpidana di 3 LP” (suspect-to-be and convict in 3 reports) and a comment by machi_achmad: “gw lagi nunggu waktu buat LP ke 3, jangan curhat ke penyidik Lo bipolar buat ngindarin ancaman pidana Lo” (I’m waiting for the time to file the third report, don’t tell the investigator you’re bipolar to dodge your criminal threat). Further on, he cites insults he says he received in person (“anak babi”, “tolol”, a threat to spit, a mention of his father’s stroke), labels such as “Hama Plenger” and “Maling”, and Articles 434 and 441; coercion (Article 448) over being escorted out of the Sona Topas tower by security and “an oknum TNI”, for which he says he has no recording; and “non-physical sexual harassment” under Article 5 of the Sexual Violence Crimes Law, where the frames end.

Observations

1. Withdraw, and never report again. The first two demands ask the other side to give up a legal right: to withdraw police reports and promise never to file one again, on a three-day deadline.
2. “Report your employees.” The threat extends to people who work for Machrio and are not named or accused of anything in the letter.
3. An apology for demeaning him. Two days earlier he had posted a photo of Machrio and his wife with a defecating cat (ev-20260717-001), and the day after he called him “Machi bangsat” on YouTube (ev-20260719-001).
4. Come to my house. Demand 6 asks a lawyer who has blocked him to come in person and explain his reports, the same request he later made of Steven Nataniel Kodyat (doc-20261024-001).
5. What followed. In August he filed a PERADI ethics complaint against Machrio (doc-20260816-001); by October he was promising to “finish off all the channels” of the “wedding-going lawyer” and his friends (ev-20261017-009).